Land of Opportunity

Anti-Black and Settler Logics in the Gentrification of Detroit

Datos Bibliográficos

ID18993493
AutoresJ Quizar (0000-0002-3594-6379, autor de correspondencia)
Año2019
Volumen43
Número2
Páginas113-133
Fecha de publicación2019-05-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaAmerican Indian Culture and Research Journal (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0161-6463 • E-ISSN: 0161-6463
EditorialCalifornia Digital Library (CDL) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.17953/aicrj.43.2.quizar
OpenAlexW3024406493
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas14

It is an increasingly common trope in anti-gentrification activism to claim that gentrification of Black neighborhoods is a form of settler colonialism. Although Native critics have pushed back against these metaphors as abstractions of, and false equivalencies to, the concrete conditions of settler colonialism, gentrifying discourse frequently draws on the language and logic of settler colonialism in narratives about the city of Detroit. In this article, I ask what it means that terms and logic that are being applied to a predominantly Black city were, and are, also used to rationalize and structure theft of land from Native Americans. Proposing that shifting white interests in Black land have led to “borrowing” of longstanding logics used to dispossess Native peoples, I argue that the reiteration of settler-colonial logics in Detroit to explain and justify gentrification manifestly both validates land grabs in the city and further erases the claims of both Black and Indigenous peoples to Detroit

Aesthetics · Archaeology · Art · Colonialism · Economic growth · Economics · Ethnology · Gentrification · Indigenous · Literature · Narrative · Political economy · Sociology · Gender Studies · History · Urban Planning and Governance · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies · Ecology