Social Oppression and Attitudes Toward Sexual Practices

Bibliographic Data

ID19001644
AuthorsAlicia M Gonzales (California State University, San Marcos, corresponding author), Gary Rolison (California State University, San Marcos)
Year2005
Volume35
Issue6
Pages715-729
Publication date2005-05-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Black Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-9347 • E-ISSN: 1552-4566
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0021934704263121
OpenAlexW2036473835
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited19

This study theoretically frames and supports the view that dominated groups engage in more behavioral self-surveillance and therefore are more restricting of their sexuality. The authors posit that sexual behavior and attitudes in the United States reflect patterns of dominance and inequality and that these structures of sexual inequality are enshrined in taken-for-granted American moral dispositions that are in turn structured by locations in the stratification order. These data find that Black women, Black men, White women, and persons of low socioeconomic status differ in the amount of sexual capital they hold, reflecting their position in a stratified society. Results obtained from this work theoretically frame and find that persons of higher social class and White males have greater access to sexual capital. Women, particularly Black women, appear to be the most affected. Findings implicate the importance of understanding how expressions of intimacy are conditioned by group dominance

Dominance (genetics) · Human sexuality · Inequality · Masculinity · Oppression · Political science · Politics · Population · Social capital · Social class · Social status · Social stratification · Socioeconomic status · Sociology · White (mutation) · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Demography · Gender Roles and Identity Studies · Gender Studies · Psychology · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub