Contemporary Paradigms in the Historical Context of the Institute of Ethnology and Social Anthropology SAS (1946 – 1989)
From the Generation of Founders to the Generation of Builders
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19002247 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tatiana Zachar Podolinská (0000-0001-6164-5740, Ústav etnológie a sociálnej antropológie SAV , Klemensova 19, 813 64 Bratislava, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 137-165 |
| Publication date | 2021-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Slovenský národopis (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1335-1303 • E-ISSN: 1339-9357 |
| Publisher | Central Library of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2478/se-2021-0008 |
| OpenAlex | W3157484357 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 9 |
The aim of this study is to offer a paradigmatic analysis of the development of the discipline – called predominantly “ethnography” and “ethnology” in the 20 th century Slovakia – in the background of the history of its development within one of the key institutions in Slovakia where research is conducted – the Institute of Ethnology and Social Anthropology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (IESA SAS). It is extremely interesting in our case how, in a relatively short period of its existence, the institution under study reacted flexibly to changes in the political regimes and discursive paradigms which resulted in system changes. The changes in external settings forced the institution to interact and intervene, which was reflected in different intensities of reorganisation of the internal ecosystem in different periods. On the other hand, it is also possible to observe major resilience which enabled the institution to preserve internal consistency of its processes. In the case of the IESA SAS, we can rather speak of “micro-historical temporalities” (measured approximately over a period of individual decades) in the background of more general longue dureé processes (i.e. long-lasting and global historical changes) in which work teams, specific personalities at leadership positions as well as the external ecosystem were significantly engaged. Within the history of the institution, the study also observes the life and modus operandi of two important generations, denoting them, in terms of the metaphorical discourse, as the generation of founders (1950s and 1960s) and the generation of builders (1970s and 1980s)
Aesthetics · Archaeology · Art · Ethnography · Humanities · Institution · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Temporalities · Anthropology · Eastern European Communism and Reforms · European Linguistics and Anthropology · Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics · History · Law
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |