Counterterrorism, Civil Society Organisations and Peacebuilding

The Role of Non-State Actors in Deradicalisation in Bima, Indonesia

Dados Bibliográficos

ID19004562
AutoresMuhammad Adlin Sila (0000-0003-1657-1628), Greg Fealy
Ano2022
Volume23
Fascículo1
Páginas97-117
Data de publicação2022-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoCanberra Anthropology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0314-9099 • E-ISSN: 1740-9314
EditoraTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14442213.2022.2041076
OpenAlexW4226136154
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas2
Referências citadas17

Indonesia’s ongoing battle against terrorism has made deradicalisation programmes a major focus of the government. The National Counter-Terrorism Agency (BNPT) has primary responsibility for persuading terrorists to desist from, if not reject, violence as part of their Islamic struggle, but its ability to deal directly with terrorists and other radicalised communities is hampered by the depth of distrust and animosity that these communities feel towards the state and its security services. As a result, BNPT has partnered with Muslim civil society organisations (CSOs) in running anti-terrorism programmes for jihadists. Indonesia’s dominant Islamic organisations, Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah, have been in the vanguard of state-CSO counter-terrorism cooperation. Eastern Indonesia has experienced persistent terrorist activity over the past two decades, including many fatal attacks on police. This article takes as a case study CSO initiatives in the West Nusa Tenggara city of Bima, with particular attention given to Ustadz Gunawan, a pivotal figure in local jihadist circles who, in 2019, renounced violence and became a proponent of peaceful jihad. This article examines the history of extremist jihadism in Bima and the counter-radicalisation efforts of CSOs and state institutions. We argue that three key factors—personal relations between jihadists and CSO leaders, family pressure and generous material incentives from state agencies—have created space for peace promotion in communities that previously condoned, if not supported, jihadist bellicosity

Battle · Civil society · Distrust · Government (linguistics) · Islam · Jihadism · Peacebuilding · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science) · Terrorism · Asian Studies and History · Islamic Studies and Radicalism · Law · Public Administration · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence