Problems Don’t Care about Disciplinary Boundaries
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19005451 |
|---|---|
| Authors | R F Bendix (0000-0003-2901-0985, University of Göttingen, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 97-101 |
| Publication date | 2020-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Anthropological Journal of European Cultures (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1755-2923 • E-ISSN: 1755-2931 |
| Publisher | Berghahn Books (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.3167/ajec.2020.290207 |
| OpenAlex | W3096099581 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 7 |
Interdisciplinary collaboration is a sensible approach for addressing complex problems. However, academic training and the resulting disciplinary habitus (and competition) often leave such collaborative skills woefully underdeveloped. This contribution outlines how ethnographic sensibilities and skills may contribute to overcoming borders between disciplinary practitioners and enhancing self-awareness within and across scientific and scholarly practice. It thus proposes ethnographic attention as interdisciplinary midwifery
Discipline · Engineering ethics · Ethnography · Habitus · Pedagogy · Social science · Sociology · Anthropology · Engineering · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics · Social Science and Policy Research
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2023 (2) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |