Introduction
The trouble with forest: definitions, values and boundaries
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19005458 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Muriel Côte (0000-0001-6359-1627, University of Zurich, corresponding author), Flurina M Wartmann (0000-0003-4788-2963, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, corresponding author), Flurina Wartmann, Ross Purves (0000-0003-4301-7024), Ross S Purves (0000-0002-9878-9243, University of Zurich, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 73 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 253-260 |
| Publication date | 2018-10-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Geographica Helvetica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0016-7312 • E-ISSN: 2194-8798 |
| Publisher | Copernicus Publications (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.5194/gh-73-253-2018 |
| OpenAlex | W2896185224 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 50 |
Forest is in trouble. The most recent (2015) FAO Forest Resources Assessment shows an encouraging trend towards a decrease in deforestation rates, but it also points out that since 1990 total forest loss corresponds to an area the size of South Africa. Efforts to curtail deforestation require reliable assessments, yet current definitions for what a forest exactly is differ significantly across countries, institutions and epistemic communities. Those differences have implications for forest management efforts: they entail different understandings about where exactly a forest starts and ends, and therefore also engender misunderstandings about where a forest should start and end, and about how forests should be managed. This special issue brings together different perspectives from practitioners and academic disciplines – including linguistics, geographic information science and human geography – around the problem of understanding and characterizing forest. By bringing together different disciplinary viewpoints, we hope to contribute to ongoing interdisciplinary efforts to analyse forest change. In this introduction, we propose that interrogating the relationship between forest definitions, boundaries and ways of valuing forests constitutes a productive way to critically conceptualize the trouble that forest is in
Deforestation (computer science) · Environmental resource management · Forest management · Geography · Viewpoints · Computer Science · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Environmental Science · Forestry · French Urban and Social Studies · Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
What forest is in the light of people's perceptions and values
Fuelwood territorialities
Being lost
Whose perspective counts? A critical look at definitions of terms used for natural and near-natural forests
Envisioning “new forests” on abandoned farmland in Russia
Narratives about space and place in Eastern Penan
Knowing Nature
Misreading the African Landscape
Carbon Conflicts and Forest Landscapes in Africa
Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory
Dynamics of global forest area
Grand Theory and Context-Specificity in the Study of Forest Dynamics
The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems
Forests
Fuzzy difference and data primitives
What forest is in the light of people's perceptions and values
Fuelwood territorialities
Forest transitions
The Redd menace
Beyond Design Principles
Promising Change, Delivering Continuity
Production forests as a conservation tool
When is a forest a forest? Forest concepts and definitions in the era of forest and landscape restoration
Between Resistance and Consent
Authority and Environment
Have there been forest transitions? Forest transition theory revisited in the context of the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem
Fixed Categories in a Portable Landscape
Paper Forests
Intervention
Whose Woods Are These? Counter-Mapping Forest Territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia
Dismantling the Divide Between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge
Green Grabbing
Beyond Ground Truth
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,75 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2024 (7) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |