L’après 2013 des confréries soufies égyptiennes
Allégeance au pouvoir, dissensions internes et « renouveau du discours religieux »
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19005677 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Costantino Paonessa (FNRS, UCLouvain, Belgique, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 352-365 |
| Publication date | 2019-07-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Compass (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0037-7686 • E-ISSN: 1461-7404 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0037768619856294 |
| OpenAlex | W2958325404 |
| Language | FR |
| References cited | 7 |
This article discusses the role of some Sufi orders and some of their sheikhs who are members of the Higher Council of Egyptian Sufi Brotherhoods in the project to ‘renew religious discourse’ (tajdīd khitab al-dīnī) launched by President al-Sissi in 2015. In particular, it raises the question of the extent to which contemporary Sufi ulemas reclaim concepts belonging to the Islamic mystical tradition, such as that of tajdīd (renewal), in order to adapt it to the needs of the country’s political agenda. Finally, based on the case of the al-’Azamiya brotherhood, this article aims to question the role played by Sufi identity as a factor of political mobilisation
Aesthetics · Ethnology · Humanities · Identity (music) · Islam · Mysticism · Order (exchange) · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Theology · Islamic Studies and History · Law · Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender · Philosophy · Political and Social Issues · Religious studies
Islamic Mysticism Contested
Les enjeux de pouvoir de l’autorité religieuse dans l’Égypte post-transition démocratique
Le rôle des confréries soufies durant les élections législatives de 2011 en Égypte
Cheminements et situation actuelle d'un ordre mystique reformateur
Quand l'élection (re)devient un plébiscite
Sufism and Politics in Contemporary Egypt
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |