Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Stratification of Neolithic Ceramic Complexes in the Konda River Basin

Bibliographic Data

ID19005869
AuthorsTatiana Yu Klementieva (Institute of History and Archaeology, corresponding author), Andrey A Pogodin (English Heritage)
Year2020
Volume19
Issue7
Pages216-228
Publication date2020-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueVestnik NSU Series History and Philology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1818-7919
PublisherNovosibirsk State University (NSU) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.25205/1818-7919-2020-19-7-216-228
OpenAlexW3098275646
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited1

Purpose. Over the past 40 years, dozens of pit-houses, semi-dugouts, above-ground huts, hearth-like structures, and burial grounds have been investigated on the territory of the Konda River basin. Classification of cultural artifacts is based on stylistic attributes and distinctions of ceramics, while chronology rests on conventional 14C dating. At the present stage, one of the most important tasks is to develop the chronology and periodization of the Neolithic sites located in the Konda River basin. The starting point in the solution of this problem should be the multilayer stratified habitation sites. This paper presents the results of the investigation of Mulymya-3 settlement, which is one of such sites. Results. In 2019, early Neolithic stratified complexes were studied in Mulymya-3 settlement. The excavations of the early buildings revealed that among the predominant artifacts of flat-bottomed dishes, there also were layers of Shoushma and Sumpanya type pottery. The stroke-ornamented ware, i. e. flat-bottomed ceramic dishes with collars and rims, were classified as “Mulymya type pottery”. 14C dating of the soot from a flat-bottomed vessel suggested that the site was more or less continuously occupied between 6 690–6 500 cal. BC. Conclusion. The artifacts from Mulymya-3 settlement made it possible to shift the lower boundary of the Neolithic age in the Konda River basin to earlier dates. A typical feature of the earliest period (6 600 / 6 500 – 3 600 / 3 400 cal. BC) is Mulymya, Shoushma, and Umytinsky type pottery characterized by original traditions of ceramic production. The appearance of pottery in the second third of the 7th millennium BC did not affect the traditional economy of taiga societies. The stone-working technique was based on fracturing technologies (percussion flaking, pressure flaking, chipping, splintering), abrasive processing, and battering. In the 6th millennium BC, the people belonging to Shoushma and Umytinsky cultures started contacting with each other, which can be proved by dishes of both types found in the excavated pit-dwelling in similar stratigraphic conditions. Another proof is the appearance of mixed-looking pottery, in particular dishes of the Sumpanya type. From the end of the 6th millennium, the Shoushma pottery traditions were gradually degrading. From that time and until the turn of the 5th–4th millennia BC the Konda River basin was inhabited by the Umytinsky population. It is probable that those were the people who continued the tradition of making flat-bottomed dishes (Satyginsky / Boborykinsky type pottery)

Archaeology · Chronology · Excavation · Geography · Hearth · Pottery · Structural basin · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Environmental Engineering and Cultural Studies · Geology · Paleontology

  • The Chilimka v Settlement and Its Place in the Neolithic of the West Siberian Taiga Zone

    Open Access•E N Dubovtseva, Tatiana Yu Klementieva•Ural Historical Journal•2022

  • The Mulymya Cultural Type of the Early Neolithic Sites of the Konda River

    Open Access•Tatiana Yu Klementieva, Andrey A Pogodin et al.•Ural Historical Journal•2023

  • The Neolithic and Early Metal complexes of the Chepkul 5 settlement in the North of the An-dreevskaya Lake System

    Open Access•A Zakh, M I Efremov•Vestnik arheologii, antropologii…•2023

  • Neolithic pottery from the settlement of Mergen 6 in the Lower Ishim (groups III and IV)

    Open Access•D N Enshin•Vestnik arheologii, antropologii…•2022

  • Radiocarbon Dates of the Tartas-1 Neolithic Complex (Early Neolithic in Baraba)

    Open Access•Viacheslav Molodin, I Molodin et al.•Vestnik NSU Series History and…•2018

Citations per year1
Citation span2022 - 2023 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae