Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Making Love

Thomas Banks’ Camadeva and the Discourses of British India c . 1790

Bibliographic Data

ID19007634
AuthorsSarah Monks (0000-0003-2763-8621, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume11
Issue2
Pages195-218
Publication date2010-07-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueVisual Culture in Britain (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1471-4787 • E-ISSN: 1941-8361
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14714781003784322
OpenAlexW2056273970
LanguageEN
Citations received1

Appropriating the visual forms and mythological language of Hinduism, Thomas Banks’ sculpture Camadeva and his Mistress on a Crocodile (c. 1794, plaster, Sir John Soane’s Museum, London) is the most sustained attempt in British art before the twentieth century to inhabit the imagined hands, minds and hearts of a non-European culture. Kamadeva is the armed Hindu god of love, the analogue of Cupid, and his invocation here – as also the poem on which it draws, written by Sir William Jones shortly after his inauguration as high court judge to Kolkata – is an example of love’s significance within the discourses on India at a time of assiduous imperial expansion in the Indian subcontinent. In Jones’ writings and legal pronouncements, and in the policy statements of Warren Hastings (the former governor-general of Bengal and Banks’ contemporary patron), ‘love’ was instrumentalized as both a weapon and a justification in the assault upon Indian subjects. Indian concepts of romantic love were therefore mined in an ideological campaign through which (it was thought) Indian subjects could be made to love their imperial governors. Incurring heady submission in the victims of its darts and yet distinguishable in intent from cruelty, ‘love’ provided adherents of democracy, such as Jones, with a way of promoting, and legislating for, a compromised version of democracy abroad (a ‘soft’ despotism) under the guise of benevolence and freedom. Banks’ sculpture gives form to love’s charged role within contemporary languages of imperial conquest – but does so in ways which foreground that love’s limits and contradictions. For the spectres of violence, sexual desire and aggressive power haunt Camadeva and suggest that this radical artist struggled with the implications of his materials. Through a close reading of its sculpted forms and their relationship to Jones’ poem as well as late eighteenth-century attitudes to Indian sculpture and eroticism, this article describes Camadeva as a sculpture in which the jagged relationship between love, power and desire is weighed

Art · Art history · Democracy · Dowry · Hinduism · Literature · Poetry · Political science · Politics · Romance · Sculpture · Sociology · Anthropological Studies and Insights · History · Law · Philosophy · Religious studies · Theater, Performance, and Music History

  • Enchanted Traps?' The Historiography of Art and Colonialism in Eighteenth-century India

    Open Access•Natasha Eaton•Literature Compass•2012

Citations per year0.07
Citation span2012 - 2012 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae