Monuments and Monumentality in a Changing Socio-Political Landscape
A View from Udaypura
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19008092 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rafia Khan (0000-0002-0693-7051, Nirma University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 289-296 |
| Publication date | 2021-11-23 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Histories (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2409-9252 • E-ISSN: 2409-9252 |
| Publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/histories1040024 |
| OpenAlex | W3216185698 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 3 |
This work intends to explore the nature of socio-political change in historical periods usually referred to as interregnal which, for the purposes of this paper, is defined as a period of discontinuity or gap in political and social organization. It traces the survival of a historical monument through two interregnal centuries of medieval Indian sub-continental history (11th–12th and 14th) to argue that modern historiographical templates which study these periods as precursors or remnants of succeeding and preceding centuries, respectively, do not sufficiently explore the socio-political possibilities innate in these periods of distributed political agency. In the context of Indian history, while historians have focused on the confrontational aspect of Hindu-Muslim polities or communities in interregnal centuries, I suggest that these periods provided fertile ground for political innovation and negotiation, thus breaking the confrontational stasis usually associated with regnal centuries
Aesthetics · Ancient history · Archaeology · Art · Historiography · Negotiation · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Asian Studies and History · History · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Law
| Highly cited | No |
|---|