Only Words Apart? Talking About “The World” in Pragmatist Philosophy of Religion
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19018405 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lisa Landoe Hedrick (University of Chicago, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 196-217 |
| Publication date | 2023-07-25 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Contemporary Pragmatism (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1572-3429 • E-ISSN: 1875-8185 |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/18758185-bja10067 |
| OpenAlex | W4385381131 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 6 |
In his well-known critique of conceptual relativism, Donald Davidson declared that we are not worlds but “only words apart.” His interpretive principle of charity asserts that the transcendental condition of disagreement is agreement. Pragmatist philosophers of religion have relied upon the principle of charity to argue against a framework theory of religion. They use the notion of a scale of observationality to illustrate where broad-scale agreement lies and place disagreement (and specifically convictional difference qualifying as “religious”) at the higher reaches, considering it interpretively parasitic. In this article, I problematize the ontological premises of construing difference in this way (specifically insofar as they betray traces of positivism) and the uses of ethnography to substantiate it. I draw on the work of contemporary anthropologists who identify with the so-called ontological turn in ethnography to help think differently about difference—about what it means to be “only words apart.”
Epistemology · Ethnography · Philosophy of religion · Positivism · Pragmatism · Relativism · Sociology · Transcendental number · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Anthropology · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|