What do people want from a welfare system? Conjoint survey evidence from UK adults
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19038631 |
|---|---|
| Authors | D Nettle (0000-0001-9089-2599, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, corresponding author), Joe Chrisp (0000-0002-6980-7537, University of Bath), Elliott Elliott Aidan Johnson (0000-0002-0937-6894, Northumbria University), Matthew Thomas Johnson (0000-0002-9987-7050, Northumbria University) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Publication date | 2023-09-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | PREPRINT |
| Publisher | Center for Open Science (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.31235/osf.io/zfnuh |
| OpenAlex | W4386964709 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 16 |
What do people want from a welfare system? Previous research has suggested a list of desiderata, such as that the system: reduces poverty; reduces inequality; improves mental and physical health; costs little; and rewards only the deserving. How do these different features trade off against one another to determine overall desirability? We conducted a conjoint survey experiment with 800 UK-resident adults, presenting them with hypothetical welfare schemes that varied on a large number of attributes. The strongest driver of choice was the effect on poverty: people were more likely to choose a scheme the more it reduced poverty. Respondents were prepared to trade off their preference for lower income taxes: even for centre-right voters, some income tax rises would be acceptable in exchange for sufficiently large reductions in poverty. Taxes on wealth and carbon emissions were positively valued. Respondents paid some attention to the effects of schemes on inequality and health. Preferences over institutional design features to do with deservingness, such as means testing, conditionality and universality, were weak. Heterogeneity in preferences by age and political orientation were present but modest. We discuss the findings with respect to the envelope of welfare systems that would be publicly acceptable
Conditionality · Demographic economics · Economic growth · Economic inequality · Economics · Generosity · Inequality · Political science · Politics · Population · Poverty · Public economics · Welfare · Welfare reform · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Global Health Care Issues · Medicine · Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Can the ‘downward spiral’ of material conditions, mental health and faith in government be stopped? Evidence from surveys in ‘red wall’ constituencies
What’s not to like? Benefit design, funding structure and support for universal basic income
Generalizing from Survey Experiments Conducted on Mechanical Turk
The Structure of American Income Tax Policy Preferences
Reforms and Redistribution
Income Perception, Information, and Progressive Taxation
Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis
Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public
Preferences for tax schemes in OECD countries, self-interest and ideology
A Robin Hood for all
The attitudinal gender gap across generations
The Deservingness Heuristic and the Politics of Health Care
The Limits of Social Solidarity
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |