Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Indirect illusory inferences from disjunction

A new bridge between deductive inference and representativeness

Bibliographic Data

ID19068200
AuthorsMathias Sablé-Meyer (0000-0003-0844-0775, Inserm), Salvador Mascarenhas (0000-0003-3381-8688, Inserm)
Year2020
Publication date2020-07-31
Open AccessNo
TypePREPRINT
PublisherCenter for Open Science (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.31234/osf.io/pwkzm
OpenAlexW4247437492
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited1

(Preprint of article forthcoming in Review of Philosophy and Psychology ; accepted March 2021.) We provide a new link between deductive and probabilistic reasoning fallacies. Illusory inferences from disjunction are a broad class of deductive fallacies traditionally explained by recourse to a matching procedure that looks for content overlap between premises. In two behavioral experiments, we show that this phenomenon is instead sensitive to real-world causal dependencies and not to exact content overlap. A group of participants rated the strength of the causal dependence between pairs of sentences. This measure proved to be a near perfect predictor of fallacious reasoning by an independent group of participants in illusory inference tasks with the same materials. In light of these results, we argue that all extant accounts of these deductive fallacies require non-trivial adjustments. Crucially, these novel indirect illusory inferences from disjunction bear a structural similarity to seemingly unrelated probabilistic reasoning problems, in particular the conjunction fallacy from the heuristics and biases literature. This structural connection was entirely obscure in previous work on these deductive problems, due to the theoretical and empirical focus on content overlap. We argue that this structural parallelism provides arguments against the need for rich descriptions and individuating information in the conjunction fallacy, and we outline a unified theory of deductive illusory inferences from disjunction and the conjunction fallacy, in terms of Bayesian confirmation theory

Cognitive psychology · Deductive reasoning · Epistemology · Fallacy · Heuristics · Inference · Probabilistic logic · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • The Conjunction Fallacy

    Woojin Chung, Kevin Dorst et al.•2023

  • The Erotetic Theory of Reasoning

    Open Access•Philipp Koralus, Salvador Mascarenhas•Philosophical Perspectives•2013

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae