Contextual analyticity
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19102428 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gregory Bochner (0000-0003-4739-6578, Département d’études cognitives ENS, EHESS CNRS Institut Jean Nicod PSL University Paris France, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 268-276 |
| Publication date | 2021-04-21 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Analytic Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2153-9596 • E-ISSN: 2153-960X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/phib.12225 |
| OpenAlex | W4213211504 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
My double aim in this paper is to argue for the claims that, when they are formed in certain ways, some judgements expressed by “I am here now” are both (a) apriori (although not solely in virtue of their meaning), and (b) necessary (albeit trivially so). I will submit that such judgements are “analytic” in the same sense that some judgements are “immune to error through misidentification” when this notion is understood in a relativistic way: in both cases, no component of the content determines the referents upon which the truth of the corresponding judgement depends. I will attempt to show that, beyond conventionally‐analytic sentences which are supposed to be (known apriori to be) true just in virtue of (knowledge of their) meaning, there are also contextuallyanalytic judgements that are (known apriori to be) true in virtue of (apriori knowledge of the) reflexive relation between the context of the judgement and the circumstance of evaluation which it targets
A priori and a posteriori · Data mining · Epistemology · Judgement · Virtue · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|