Patrick v Patrick and Re A letter to a Young Person

"A letter", Nietzsche once wrote, "is an unannounced visit, the postman the agent of rude surprises". Given the extremely personal nature of many family law judgments, it is rare and rather surprising when parties, their children or, indeed, the judiciary set out their views in the form of a published letter. Two recent cases in which courts have communicated their decision by letter (Patrick v Patrick and Re A letter to a Young Person) are therefore worthy of note. In each case, the letter was addressed to the children in respect of whom orders were sought. The children ranged in age from six to fourteen years.Patrick, a decision of Sheriff Anwar at Glasgow, concerned a “bitter and acrimonious dispute” regarding whether a father should be entitled to “contact, in any form” with his three children described as being “aged between 12 and 6 years”. In Re A letter to a Young Person, Mr Justice Peter Jackson determined a relocation dispute involving a fourteen year-old boy who had been the subject of repeat family court orders since he was one year old. Both judicial letters received publicity, with excerpts from each being published in national newspapers

Political science · Psychoanalysis · History · Law · Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies · Psychology

• Manipulation and Domestic Abuse in Contested Contact – Threats to Children's Participation Rights

  Open Access•Fiona Morrison, E Kay M Tisdall et al.•Family Court Review•2020

  Add to list

• The Role of Children's Voices and Feedback Mechanisms in Family Justice

  Open Access•Judy Cashmore•Child & Family Social Work•2025

  Add to list