Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Three Paradigms behind River Governance in Japan

Modern Technicism, Nature Conservationism and Life Environmentalism

Bibliographic Data

ID19180683
AuthorsYukiko Kada (University of Shiga Prefecture, corresponding author)
Year2006
Volume15
Issue1
Pages40-54
Publication date2006-10-04
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Japanese Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0918-7545 • E-ISSN: 1475-6781
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1475-6781.2006.00084.x
OpenAlexW2012074233
LanguageEN
Citations received5

In this paper I examine river governance or river policy in Japan through the process of modernization over one century and analyze three hidden paradigms, “modern technicism”, “nature conservationism” and “life environmentalism”, with the theory of environmental value. Japanese rivers were governed traditionally by local people (life environmentalism) but the river management was put under the control of administration and the specialist (modern technicism) in the tide of modernization, and in order to confront this situation a new paradigm of “nature conservationism” was born. In the analysis of the stages of river policy development, the development of economic and political power will be traced according to an environmental sociology point of view. This means analyzing people's initiatives resulting from their recognition and value in the political and economical arena. Structuring of river governance through the interactive process of “government and self‐government” is also analyzed by putting an emphasis on local residents as a political body and second, I will describe the theoretical direction of environmental sociology. Lake Biwa and The Yodo River Basin system, which have historical importance in Japanese river policy, will be taken as an example. From the position of environmental sociology, river governance as an interactive process of “government and self‐governance” based on independence of people, is one practical model that can give us important keys for the new river governance, transcending difference of social conditions. Consider learning the spirit of traditional communal structure as a process of practice for building a new communalism, life environmentalism model, which fits today's society

Corporate governance · Ecological modernization · Economics · Environmental ethics · Environmental governance · Environmental sociology · Environmentalism · Government (linguistics) · Management · Modernization theory · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Value (mathematics) · Japanese History and Culture · Law · Public Administration

  • Integrating diverse knowledge in the organisational response to anthropogenic flooding. The case of rafting guides in Kyushu, Japan

    Open Access•Beata M Kowalczyk, Tamotsu Ichihana et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2025

  • Advocacy Coalition Framework in Environmental Governance Studies

    Open Access•Taichi Ohno•International Review of Public…•2022

  • Hamaguchi Ryūsuke's Evil Does Not Exist as Degrowth Parable

    Jennifer Coates, Joseph F Coates•positions asia critique•2025

  • Developing Rivers

    Open Access•Abhik Chakraborty•SAGE Open•2013

  • Unpacking conflict-ridden everyday life

    Open Access•Daisaku Yamamoto, Takehito Noda•Progress in Environmental Geography•2024

Citations per year0.38
Citation span2013 - 2025 (13)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae