Framing the Musk Effect
Turkish Media Narratives on Trump, Musk, and the 2024 U.S. Elections
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19213339 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sarphan Uzunoğlu (0000-0002-9736-1763, İzmir University of Economics, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00027642261459239 |
| OpenAlex | W7164878881 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 29 |
This study examines how Turkish newspapers with divergent ideological orientations— Yeni Şafak , Sabah , Sözcü , and Evrensel —construct Elon Musk and Donald Trump as symbolic figures within Turkey’s polarized media system. Drawing on 144 news and opinion pieces, the research employs an integrated qualitative design that combines systematic content analysis with discourse-historical analysis to investigate how global technological elites are domesticated within national moral and ideological frameworks. The analysis follows a hierarchical coding strategy encompassing evaluative tone, thematic framing, discursive strategy, and moral valence, ensuring analytical consistency through intercoder reliability and multi-level triangulation. Findings reveal a polarized yet morally coherent media field. Pro-government outlets frame Musk and Trump as embodiments of rational modernity and entrepreneurial sovereignty, while oppositional newspapers depict them as symbols of capitalist spectacle and inequality. Across ideological divides, technology itself is moralized—either celebrated as virtue or condemned as vice—demonstrating that Turkish journalism constructs technological modernity as a moral and political category rather than a neutral domain of progress. The study introduces the concept of the ‘Musk Effect’ to capture how transnational technological elites function as discursive instruments through which semi-peripheral nations negotiate soft power, legitimacy, and modernity. Situated at the intersection of celebrity politics, digital diplomacy, and platform capitalism, the analysis highlights the methodological value of multi-layered qualitative triangulation in revealing the ideological work of media discourse in contemporary techno-politics
Discourse analysis · Frame analysis · Framing (construction) · Ideology · Journalism · Modernity · Narrative · Newspaper · Turkish · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Media Studies and Communication · Turkey's Politics and Society
The Costs of Connection
Comparing Media Systems
The Politics of Fear
A Handbook of Media and Communication Research
Digital Capitalism
Commentary
Empowered or Constrained in Platform Governance? An Analysis of Twitter Users’ Responses to Elon Musk’s Takeover
Media and Democracy in Turkey
Two International Propaganda Models
Elon Musk’s year on X
Political Correctness
From Political Unknown to an Unwanted Incumbent
Trump, Mueller Investigation, and Alleged Russian Election Meddling
Naturalistic inquiry
Spaces of Negotiation
The continuing lure of the mediated centre in times of deep mediatization
The Global Impacts of US Presidential Elections
Framing
Creating the Desired Citizen
Approaching celebrity studies
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Soft Power and American Foreign Policy
Do Foreigners Count? Internationalization of Presidential Campaigns
The Evolution of Trump's Image in Russian Media
The Social Circulation of Media Discourse and the Mediation of Communities
Now I see it, now I don't
Techno-feudalism or platform capitalism? Conceptualising the digital society
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |