Trade, treaty and territoriality
British empire on the high roads of Central Asia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19214682 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fayaz Ali (0000-0001-9474-1931, Azim Premji University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 149-173 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Indian Economic & Social History Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0019-4646 • E-ISSN: 0973-0893 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00194646261439990 |
| OpenAlex | W7159649927 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 22 |
This article discusses the impact of British commercial policies on the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir. It argues that British imperialist policies should be seen as a continued expansion of the empire by integrating South Asian markets into the larger economies of the empire. It takes the example of the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir and hints at the changes in the magnitude of trade, which largely changed the region’s economic output towards British India. For instance, when the region came into political contact with the British after the 1850s, it hardly dealt with trade by or through the empire, but by the early 1870s, cotton piece goods from both British India and Europe constituted more than 40% of trade into or through the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir. Second, the article discusses the empire’s need for constant expansion and exploring unknown regions for information and control. At the expense of the princely state, the British asserted their dominance through treaties, creating spaces of access to control and monitor territories. Third, through employing trade as their motive, and expanding territorial limits with the treaties as justification, the British were able to create a rationale for intervention in the region. Thus, the article also contributes to the historiography of princely states in colonial India, which have been characterised as instances of divisible sovereignties, and instead argues that British paramountcy was the political norm and regional sovereignties meant little in the face of British imperialist expansion
British Empire · Colonialism · Dominance (genetics) · Empire · Historiography · Politics · State (computer science) · Treaty · South Asian Cinema and Culture · South Asian Studies and Conflicts · South Asian Studies and Diaspora
Alibis of Empire
Hindu Rulers, Muslim Subjects
A Search for Sovereignty
Revisiting Approaches to British Imperialism
Salt, Smuggling, and Sovereignty
On the Geographical Position of Yarkund, and Some Other Places in Central Asia
V. Kashghar and the Politics of Central Asia, 1868–1878
Salt, smuggling and citizenship
Commerce and Christianity’
The venture of the Central Asian Trading Company in Eastern Turkistan, 1874–5
The Magnitude of Land Revenue Demand in Kashmir-1846 to 1900 A.D
The Imperialism of Free Trade
Indirect Rule in the British Empire
From Colonialism to Postcolonial Colonialism
Push and Shove
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |