Operationalizing Social Contracts
A New Measurement of Government Deliverables
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19216508 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Loewe (0000-0002-3555-165X, German Institute of Development and Sustainability), Amirah El-Haddad (0000-0001-5569-8766, German Institute of Development and Sustainability), Tina Zintl (0000-0002-8129-3495, German Institute of Development and Sustainability, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studies in Comparative International Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0039-3606 • E-ISSN: 1936-6167 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12116-026-09504-7 |
| OpenAlex | W7164572100 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 27 |
The international development debate is increasingly referring to the notion of the “social contract”. In this paper, we measure what governments give societies, a core element of social contracts. To enable social contract comparison across countries and over time, we develop indices to capture the three “Ps”: protection against internal and external threats, provision of social and economic services, and political participation . These indices are composed of indicators, which are mainly input variables to gauge the willingness of governments to deliver the three Ps. Subsequently, we calculate the values of 154 countries for the three indices around the year 2019. The results show that the indices are useful and valid. They highly correlate with each other and with other indicators such as per capita income and the Human Development Index. Yet, these correlations are not perfect, meaning that the indices are not another redundant development index. They add information and value. Finally, we make a first step in identifying patterns in the results. Countries in Latin America were doing comparatively well on average in terms of political participation in 2019. When controlling for per capita income, governments in sub-Saharan Africa, were delivering disproportionately more on average in terms of protection and political participation , but less so in terms of provision . Countries in the Middle East and North Africa fail mainly with regard to political participation
Developing country · Element (criminal law) · Government (linguistics) · Latin Americans · Operationalization · Per capita · Per capita income · Politics · Social security · Corruption and Economic Development · Human Rights and Development · Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Social Contracts for Development
Justice, Reconciliation, and State-Building in Post-Gaddafi Libya
Unlocking the Employment Potential in the Middle East and North Africa
What We Owe Each Other
Health Vulnerability Index for Disaster Risk Reduction
The Failure of the Social Contract in Iraq
Towards an exclusionary social contract
Drivers of change in social contracts
Rethinking social contracts in the Mena region
Reconstituting social contracts in conflict-affected Mena countries
Redefining the social contract in the wake of the Arab Spring
The rise and decline of the populist social contract in the Arab world
The social contract as a tool of analysis
Perspectives on the rebel social contract
The human development index
(Re)making the social contract
State-society relations and the sources of support for the Putin regime
Social services to claim legitimacy
The worldwide governance indicators
An anthropology of the social contract
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |