Depoliticising the “Surplus” through Welfare Imaginaries in Singapore National Day Rallies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19216633 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eve Yeo (0000-0002-4132-3215, Independent researcher), J Greener (0000-0001-7087-3040, Centre for Social Justice, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-26 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-08 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Contemporary Asia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0047-2336 • E-ISSN: 1752-7554 |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00472336.2026.2671911 |
| OpenAlex | W7163940246 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 33 |
With welfare states considered contested sites for the construction of unequal social relations, this article explores official welfare imaginaries – discursive practices and narratives which construct the nature of the “good society” and the role of government policies in achieving this – as strategies of depoliticisation, aimed at reproducing authoritarian governance. Through an analysis of Singapore National Day rally speeches by then Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, the article focuses on appeals to maintaining Singapore’s established cultural, societal, and economic relations. Three inter-connected depoliticising logics to National Day speeches are highlighted: technocracy (an appeal to government through rational expertise); survivalism (an appeal to stable leadership in the face of global challenges); and anti-welfarism (an appeal to the necessity of eligibility-based and productivity-geared welfare). Central to maintaining oligarchic modes of authoritarian political governance, welfare imaginaries disseminated through officialised political narratives pre-emptively diffuse alternative discourses and practices which could trouble established hierarchies. The mobilisation of these imaginaries insulates the political economy from deeper critique or the possibility of popular mobilisation against an economy skewed towards enriching an oligarchic state-capitalist elite. Welfare imaginaries help to legitimate accumulation based in disciplined labour and one-party rule albeit within a welfare state facilitating asset-building for some
Appeal · Authoritarianism · Narrative · Politics · Technocracy · Welfare · Welfare state · Asian Studies and History · Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics · Socioeconomic Development in Asia
The Political Economy of Oligarchy and the Reorganization of Power in Indonesia
The Gentle Art of Retroduction
The Ruling Elite of Singapore
The Political Economy of Social Control in Singapore
Towards a Cultural Political Economy
Authoritarian Rule of Law
The ‘actually existing smart city’
Depoliticisation
Towards a critique of cybernetic urbanism
Reproduction, discipline, inequality
Electoral rules and manufacturing legislative supermajority
New Labour and the Politics of Depoliticisation
Support for Deserving Families
Beyond technocracy
Consolidating authoritarian rule
Value in Motion
Productivist Welfare Capitalism
Rethinking depoliticisation
Critical semiotic analysis and cultural political economy
Capital, Crisis and the State
The right to the city
Inequality and Political Representation in the Philippines and Singapore
Hegemonic authoritarianism and singapore
Singapore's National Day Rally speech
Grievance Politics and Technocracy in a Developmental State
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |