From demonstrative to conjunct
Grammaticalization of the Korean conjunct ku-kes-to ‘on top of that’
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19219974 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Minju Kim (0000-0002-3097-2164, Claremont McKenna College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 261 |
| Pages | 197-211 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Pragmatics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0378-2166 • E-ISSN: 1879-1387 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2026.05.001 |
| OpenAlex | W7164176086 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 13 |
This study draws on both historical corpora and present-day natural conversation corpora and employs the theoretical concepts of grammaticalization and cooptation to investigate the development of a Korean demonstrative construction into the scalar additive conjunct ‘on top of that’. The source construction ku-kes-to ‘even that’, composed of ku-kes ‘that thing’ and to ‘also’ or ‘even’, was first attested in the 19th century. In the intermediate stage of the 1920s, it started to be construed both as ‘even that’ and ‘on top of that’. In the 1930s, it became fully grammaticalized as the conjunct 'on top of that', and it also began to form a thetical (or parenthetical) inserted into another sentence while remaining syntactically and prosodically detached from it. From the 1940s onward, it continued to expand its range of use, appearing in increasingly diverse positions, including those without a preceding NP, having lost its demonstrative attributes. As the first study to examine the development of the conjunct ku-kes-to , this study delineates the construction’s step-by-step changes, with particular attention to the critical period from the 19th century to the 1940s. The study argues that the development of the conjunct ku-kes-to simultaneously involves textualization, subjectification, and intersubjectification. In doing so, it provides supporting evidence for Traugott’s (2022, 2024) recent proposal that, contrary to her earlier accounts (e.g., 1982, 2003), no fixed historical ordering can be generalized among these three processes
Colloquialism · Demonstrative · Germanic languages · Grammaticalization · Categorization, perception, and language · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
On thetical grammar
Secondary grammaticalization and subjectification
Scalar Additive Operators in the Languages of Europe
Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling
Sentence-initial I think (that) and I believe (that)
Context-induced reinterpretation and (inter)subjectification
Cooptation as a discourse strategy
Development of the Korean proximal demonstrative into an affective stance marker
Intersubjectivity, stance, and Korean general extenders
Development of the Korean connective ultheyntey into a final particle of wishing and worrying
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |