Not a Decline but a Constraint
An analysis of youth agricultural engagement in Malawi using nationally representative data
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19220501 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sylvia David Kachola (0009-0006-6600-8277, University of Malawi, corresponding author), Donald Makoka (0000-0002-9426-372X, African Institute for Development Policy), Loveness Gloria Phiri (0009-0006-3177-1918, Egerton University), Christopher Chombo (0009-0004-9232-2556, University of Malawi) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 126 |
| Pages | 104230-104230 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-08 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Rural Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0743-0167 • E-ISSN: 1873-1392 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104230 |
| OpenAlex | W7163922063 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 47 |
Youth engagement in agriculture is often described as declining, yet evidence from many parts of the Global South shows that participation is shaped more by structural constraints than by a lack of interest. This study examines the determinants of Malawian youth agricultural engagement using four waves of nationally representative data from the Malawi Integrated Household Panel Survey for 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2019. Youth participation is classified into three categories based on their involvement -crop production, livestock production, or both. A multinomial logit model is used to analyse how individual characteristics, household conditions, and access to agricultural support systems shape these forms of engagement. The results show that youth agricultural participation is strongly associated with access to land, extension services, and farm implements. These factors have the largest marginal effects across all model specifications. Higher levels of education correspond with lower probabilities of engagement, while age and marital status show positive associations. Predicted probabilities indicate modest changes over time, with a gradual shift from diversified to more specialized participation. The findings contribute to rural studies debates by showing that youth engagement in agriculture is shaped by structural and institutional conditions rather than by disengagement. Policies that expand land access, strengthen extension services and improve access to basic agricultural tools may support more inclusive youth livelihoods.
Agricultural development · Agricultural productivity · Agriculture · Youth engagement · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Agricultural risk and resilience · Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
Landscapes of opportunity
Do youth conceptualizations influence the inclusion of young people in sustainable agriculture intensification? Insights from Ghana and Malawi
Deconstructing involuntary financial exclusion
Demographics and course choices
Young people not in Employment, Education or Training (Neet) in Sub-Saharan Africa
Who Wants to Farm? Answers Depend on How You Ask
Bottom-Up Approaches and Decentralized Extension Structures for Improving Access to and Quality of Extension Services and Technology Adoption
From family to markets. How institutional determinants of rural youth transitions have changed in Senegal and Zambia over time
Can food-for-work encourage agricultural production
The impact of agricultural extension services in the context of a heavily subsidized input system
Impact of Farmer Field Schools on Agricultural Productivity and Poverty in East Africa
Are Rural Youth in Ethiopia Abandoning Agriculture
Perceptions and Aspirations
A Last Resort and Often Not an Option at All’
Agriculture and the Generation Problem
Youth’s access to agricultural land in Sub-Saharan Africa
Customary Land titling and inter-generational wealth transfer in Malawi
Youth in agriculture and food security in Nigeria
Hard work and hazard
Youth perceptions of agriculture
Unpacking youth engagement in agriculture
| Highly cited | No |
|---|