Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reframing digital inequality

Investigating symbolic boundaries in media use among Norwegian adolescents

Bibliographic Data

ID19224006
AuthorsEdda J Arneberg (University of Oslo, corresponding author)
Year2026
Pages1-19
Publication date2026-06-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Youth Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1367-6261 • E-ISSN: 1469-9680
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13676261.2026.2686102
OpenAlexW7164337619
LanguageEN
References cited41

This study explores how Norwegian adolescents assign symbolic value to media preferences and practices, and how distinctions and cultural hierarchies contribute to inequality by reinforcing group boundaries. Findings show that adolescents categorized as cultural upper middle and elite classes draw symbolic boundaries within their own social group (in-group) by portraying an unnamed out-group as lazy, unintelligent and less productive. These boundaries are expressed through distinctions that frame certain media as ‘intelligent’, ‘stupefying’, or ‘easily attainable’ and media practices as either ‘productive’ or ‘healthy’ and therefore preferable. Aligned with neoliberal ideals of self-optimization and productivity, the study argues that managing media use and restricting screen time have become markers of class belonging among the cultural upper middle and elite classes. Drawing on interviews and fieldwork in both physical and digital spaces, the study provides insight into digital inequalities in a Norwegian context and how adolescents aged 16–19 use and experience media. It highlights the importance of moving beyond access, skills and user habits in digital inequality studies and considers how media preferences and practices hold symbolic value, which can reveal hidden divides between social groups

Cognitive reframing · Context (archaeology) · Digital media · Elite · Highbrow · Inequality · Norwegian · Social inequality · Social media · The Symbolic · Child Development and Digital Technology · Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Social Media and Politics

  • The Third Digital Divide

    Massimo Ragnedda, Массимо Рагнедда•The Third Digital Divide•2017

  • The Platform Society

    José Van Dijck, Thomas Poell et al.•Platform Society•2018

  • Unequal Childhoods

    A Lareau•Unequal childhoods•2019

  • Growing Up Wired

    Open Access•Lauren A Spies Shapiro, Gayla Margolin•Clinical Child and Family…•2014

  • Money, Morals, and Manners

    M Lamont•Money, Morals, and Manners•1992

  • The Production of Culture

    Diana Crane•The Production of Culture•1992

  • Making sense of YouTubers

    Open Access•Carolina Martínez, Tobias Olsson•Journal of Children and Media•2019

  • The Sociology of Elite Distinction

    Open Access•Jean-Pascal Daloz, Jean‐pascal Daloz•Sociology of Elite Distinction•2010

  • Interviewing in Social Science Research

    Lee Ann Fujii, Fujii Lee Ann•Interviewing in Social Science…•2017

  • Social Identity

    Richard Jenkins•Social Identity•2004

  • ‘I’m not a snob, but…’

    Open Access•Vegard Jarne, Friedman•Poetics•2016

  • Have your cake and feed it forward too

    Open Access•Steffen Krüger•First Monday•2023

  • Protecting the Developing Mind in a Digital Age

    Tara C Thiagarajan, Jennifer Jane Newson et al.•Journal of Human Development•2025

  • Uncovering longitudinal life narratives

    Open Access•B Robards, Siân Lincoln•Qualitative Research•2017

  • Networked privacy

    Open Access•Alice E Marwick, Arthur Marwick et al.•New Media & Society•2014

  • Media practice and class-making

    Open Access•J Lindell, Aleksandra Dominika Kas•Media Culture & Society•2024

  • Defusing moral panic

    Open Access•Kobe De Keere, Estrelle Thunnissen et al.•Media Culture & Society•2021

  • Digital Gambling

    Open Access•Natasha Dow Schüll•The Annals of the American…•2005

  • Cultural Practices and Socio-Digital Inequalities in Europe

    Open Access•Predrag Cvetičanin, Lucas Page Pereira et al.•Cultural Sociology•2025

  • Distinctions in the making

    Open Access•A Prieur, M Savage et al.•British Journal of Sociology•2023

  • Plugged In

    Patti M Valkenburg, Jessica Taylor Piotrowski•Plugged in•2017

  • Modes of consumption

    Open Access•Vegard Jarne•Poetics•2015

  • Social capital and the intergenerational transmission of cultural capital

    Open Access•Andreas Roaldsnes•Poetics•2024

  • Addressing Recognition Gaps

    Open Access•M Lamont•American Sociological Review•2018

  • Moratorium or waithood? Forms of time-taking and the changing shape of youth

    Open Access•Valentina Cuzzocrea•Time & Society•2019

  • What is missing? Cultural processes and causal pathways to inequality

    M Lamont, Beljean et al.•Socio-Economic Review•2014

  • The media go-along

    Open Access•Kristian Møller•MedieKultur Journal of media and…•2016

  • The Neoliberal Self

    Open Access•Jim Mcguigan•Culture Unbound Journal of…•2014

  • Affordances-in-Practice

    Open Access•Nathalie Van Raemdonck, Ike Picone et al.•Social Media + Society•2025

  • Searching for Oneself on YouTube

    Open Access•Claire Balleys, Florence Millerand et al.•Social Media + Society•2020

  • Elite Communities and Polarization in Neoliberal Society

    Open Access•M Holmqvist, Ilan Wiesel•Critical Sociology•2023

  • Class, Culture and Culinary Tastes

    Open Access•Magne P Flemmen, Magne Flemmen et al.•Sociology•2018

  • The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences

    M Lamont, Molnar et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•2002

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae