Saturation – a one-size-fits-all fallacy
A critique rooted in phenomenological and qualitative content analysis perspectives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19224642 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cecilie Nørby Lyhne (0000-0001-8380-7704, Aarhus University, corresponding author), Annelise Norlyk (0000-0002-8512-228X, Aarhus University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-20 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Qualitative Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1468-7941 • E-ISSN: 1741-3109 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14687941261442136 |
| OpenAlex | W7154954117 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 36 |
This paper challenges the universal application of saturation across qualitative methodologies. Saturation is often used to justify sample sizes and findings in qualitative research, yet its relevance varies across methodological approaches. Despite extensive debate, there remains a lack of clarity regarding the applicability of saturation to specific qualitative approaches, particularly within health sciences where its use is often expected. This paper offers a critical examination of the idea of saturation from the perspectives of phenomenological research and qualitative content analysis. We argue that saturation should not be treated as a universal marker of quality, as its uncritical use across qualitative methodologies risks methodological mismatch and oversimplification. Instead, we argue that researchers justify sampling and analytical strategies according to the epistemological logic of the chosen method. We call on researchers, editors and reviewers to critically reflect on the use of saturation in evaluation criteria and support methodologically grounded approaches assessments of qualitative research quality
CLARITY · Grounded theory · Phenomenology (philosophy) · Qualitative research · Relevance (law) · Saturation (graph theory) · Health Policy Implementation Science · Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Essentials of existential phenomenological research.
Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice
A hands-on guide to doing content analysis
Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis
Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process
The Theory, Practice, and Evaluation of the Phenomenological Method as a Qualitative Research Procedure
Sample size for saturation in qualitative research
Sample size in qualitative research
Thematic Analysis
Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (Coreq)
Saturation controversy in qualitative research
Qualitative content analysis–framing the analytical process of inductive content analysis to develop a sound study design
Saturation in qualitative research
To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
Saturation
The Significance of Saturation
What Makes a Phenomenological Study Phenomenological? An Analysis of Peer-Reviewed Empirical Nursing Studies
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research
One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis
But Is It Phenomenology
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies
Qualitative Content Analysis
Demystification and Actualisation of Data Saturation in Qualitative Research Through Thematic Analysis
How Many Interviews Are Enough
Using conceptual depth criteria
Unsatisfactory Saturation
| Highly cited | No |
|---|