Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Lithuanian and the syntactic structure of pseudo-clefts

Bibliographic Data

ID19226989
AuthorsAxel Holvoet (0000-0003-1744-5893, Vilnius University, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume79
Issue1
Pages127-146
Publication date2026-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguage Typology and Universals (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1867-8319 • E-ISSN: 2196-7148
PublisherDe Gruyter (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/stuf-2026-2004
OpenAlexW7152405906
LanguageEN
References cited11

The article deals with the pseudo-cleft construction (also known as wh -cleft) in Lithuanian, a Baltic language. It focuses on the syntactic and morphosyntactic changes that have set the Lithuanian pseudo-cleft apart from its source construction, the specificational copular construction. It is argued that this pseudo-cleft has become monoclausal as a result of a process in which the kernel component of the pseudo-cleft construction (consisting of relative pronoun, relative-clause verb and copula/focus marker) became non-compositional and started occupying a slot corresponding to that of the simple-clause verb. This process may have been driven by the morphosyntactic marking assigned by the relative-clause verb being copied onto the focus noun phrase and subsequently being reanalysed as governed by the pseudo-cleft kernel component as a whole. As a result of these processes, the Lithuanian pseudo-cleft is superficially still similar to the original specificational construction from which it derives, but certain morphosyntactic and syntactic features betray it as being monoclausal. The Lithuanian pseudo-cleft is further considered against a cross-linguistic background to point out that it represents a non-trivial and typologically interesting instantiation of the more general process of development of clefts and pseudo-clefts into monoclausal structures

Lithuanian · Nominalization · Nominative case · Noun · Noun phrase · Syntax · Verb · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Linguistics and language evolution · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • The Cambridge Grammar of Classical Greek

    Open Access•Evert van Emde Boas, Albert Rijksbaron et al.•Cambridge Grammar of Classical…•2019

  • Constructionalization and Constructional Changes

    Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Graeme Trousdale•Constructionalization And…•2013

  • World Lexicon of Grammaticalization

    Open Access•Tania Kuteva, Bernd Heine et al.•World Lexicon of Grammaticalization•2019

  • Information Structure and Sentence Form

    Open Access•Knud Lambrecht•Information Structure and…•1994

  • Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective

    Open Access•Alice C Harris, Lyle Campbell•Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguist…•1995

  • The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language

    Open Access•Rodney Huddleston, Geoffrey K Pullum et al.•Cambridge Grammar of the English…•2002

  • Norvegų kalbos lūžio konstrukcija ir jos atitikmenys lietuvių kalboje

    Open Access•Aurelija Griškevičienė•Baltistica•2002

  • Pseudoclefts Crosslinguistically

    Open Access•Sabine Iatridou, Spyridola Varlokosta•Natural Language Semantics•1998

  • A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions

    Open Access•Knud Lambrecht•Linguistics•2001

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae