A decade of change
Leadership trends in China’s leading universities (2013–2023)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19229331 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Futao Huang (0000-0003-1322-7784, Hiroshima University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-1560 • E-ISSN: 1573-174X |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10734-026-01637-x |
| OpenAlex | W7130835028 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 31 |
This study investigates the transformation of leading university leadership in China between 2013 and 2023, drawing on a longitudinal dataset that spans Party and administrative systems across 108 leading (211 Project) universities in 2013 and 147 Double First-Class institutions in 2023. Employing a mixed-methods design that combines quantitative trend analysis with documentary and institutional-website evidence, it traces changes in leaders’ socio-demographic, academic, and career profiles—covering degree attainment, disciplinary background, international experience, institutional mobility, gender, age, and political affiliation. The findings reveal marked professionalization: doctorate-holding leaders became nearly universal among presidents and increasingly common among Party secretaries, while international exposure expanded notably, particularly in non-985 Double First-Class universities. Cross-institutional mobility rose sharply, indicating a more open yet politically filtered leadership market. In contrast, gender imbalance and older age structures persisted, and Communist Party membership remained near-universal. Incremental governance adjustments—such as expanded vice-presidential portfolios, dual-role appointments, and portfolio specialization—reflect growing managerial differentiation within a Party-led framework. Overall, the results demonstrate a hybrid governance model in which professional modernization coexists with centralized political control. By integrating coordinated 2013–2023 data with comparative interpretation, the study provides new longitudinal evidence on how China’s leading universities reconcile global competitiveness with state supervision, contributing to broader debates on leadership professionalization and governance transformation in higher education
China · Communism · Corporate governance · Discipline · Higher education · Modernization theory · Operationalization · Politics · Professionalization · Academic Freedom and Politics · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Higher Education Governance and Development
The Higher Education System
Theory of the firm
Leading for Research Excellence
University presidents’ international education experience and the internationalization of higher education institutions
Women academics in Chinese universities
University managers or institutional leaders? An exploration of top-level leadership in Chinese universities
Morality and ability
The Changing Nature of the Academic Deanship
Managing neo-liberalism with Chinese characteristics
Demystifying underrepresentation of women leaders in higher education
The Iron Cage Revisited
Who leads China's leading universities
A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities
Institutionalized Organizations
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |