A Bayesian Framework to Account for Misclassification Error and Uncertainty in the Estimation of Abortion Prevalence
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19230378 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marija Pejchinovska (0000-0002-3777-5649, corresponding author), Monica Alexander |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 234-255 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studies in Family Planning (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0039-3665 • E-ISSN: 1728-4465 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/sifp.70053 |
| PMID | 42084205 |
| OpenAlex | W7160326135 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 43 |
Obtaining reliable estimates of the prevalence of induced abortion remains a significant challenge in abortion research. Recently, one indirect, survey‐based technique for measuring abortion outcomes, the confidante method, has gained particular attention. The method has been applied in various social and legal contexts; however, its efficacy has not been uniformly established. Increasingly, focus has shifted to assessing the method's key assumptions and quantifying the biases that arise from violations of them. We propose a general statistical framework to conceptualize and quantify the impact of biases on measuring abortion prevalence from such surveys. Specifically, we define the relationship between observed and true abortion prevalence based on misclassification error related to the sensitivity and specificity of the survey instrument. This formulation leads naturally to a Bayesian modeling approach to estimate abortion prevalence, allowing for differing knowledge of and different levels of uncertainty about the misclassification parameters to be incorporated in the modeling process, with that uncertainty being propagated through to the final estimates. We illustrate our framework and modeling approach on data from an application of the confidante method in Uganda in 2018, where we account for systematic differences in confidante abortion reports based on the self‐reported abortion experiences of survey respondents
Abortion · Bayes estimator · Bayes' theorem · Bayesian probability · Estimation · Population · Statistical model · Global Maternal and Child Health · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Generalized Linear Models
A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression
The Reporting of Sensitive Behavior by Adolescents
An Application of the Confidante Method to Estimate Induced Abortion Incidence in Java, Indonesia
Estimating the Incidence of Induced Abortion in Java, Indonesia, 2018
The reporting of sensitive behavior by adolescents
Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys
The Measure of Induced Abortion Levels in Mexico Using Random Response Technique
Pma2020
Prevalence and Reporting of Induced Abortion in Turkey
Can a List Experiment Improve Validity of Abortion Measurement
An Assessment of Third‐Party Reporting of Close Ties to Measure Sensitive Behaviors
Estimating the Social Visibility of Abortions in Uganda and Ethiopia Using the Game of Contacts
Estimating clandestine abortion with the confidants method-results from Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
Estimating abortion incidence using the network scale-up method
Measuring Induced Abortion in Mexico
| Highly cited | No |
|---|