From fragmentation to framework
Negotiating urban definitions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19230426 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Céline Van Migerode (0000-0002-4023-7665, European Corporate Governance Institute, corresponding author), Ate Poorthuis (0000-0002-3808-7493, KU Leuven), Ben Derudder (0000-0001-6195-8544, Joint Research Center) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Urban Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0042-0980 • E-ISSN: 1360-063X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00420980261440352 |
| OpenAlex | W7154483059 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 34 |
This article starts from the premise that purposefully working toward shared urban definitions can foster constructive dialogue across geographical and disciplinary boundaries. Yet, the process of standardisation is inherently power-laden and requires difficult work to navigate tensions between simplicity and diversity. Drawing on a qualitative interview study, we explore how an urban standardisation effort can be organised in practice: what the role of different stakeholders is and how different forms of diversity are negotiated. To do so, we employ the revision of a subclass in the Degree of Urbanisation (DEGURBA) definition as a case study. Our findings suggest that standardisation not only involves balancing simplicity and diversity but also navigates a trade-off between open deliberation and practical feasibility. We argue that DEGURBA’s approach, where one stakeholder group establishes the overarching framework and the input of other stakeholder groups is elicited for fine-tuning, presents a pragmatic way to foster participation while maintaining feasibility. However, we also contend that prioritising open deliberation could be a valuable alternative pathway, even when such an effort would not lead to a standard definition. In that case, it is not the standard itself, but the process leading up to it that could guide productive discourse on the urban
Constructive · Deliberation · Diversity (politics) · Equity (law) · Negotiation · Premise · Process (computing) · Simplicity · Stakeholder · Global Urban Networks and Dynamics · Smart Cities and Technologies · Urban Planning and Governance
The Origins of Scaling in Cities
Principles and practical criteria for effective participatory environmental planning and decision-making
A spatially-explicit sensitivity analysis of urban definitions
Whose Knowledge Counts? Unpacking the Uneven Geographies and Politics of Knowledge Co-Production in Ipbes
Doing global urban studies
On the difficulty of agreeing upon a universal logic for city standards
Assemblage and critical urbanism
Constructing a universal logic of urban control
Knowledge co-production for decision-making in human-natural systems under uncertainty
Fragmentation and urban knowledge
Applying the Degree of Urbanisation to the globe
Measuring the size and growth of cities using nighttime light
Doing comparative urbanism differently
Cities on and off the map
Urban studies after the age of the city
City as Truth-Spot
Knowing and governing cities through urban indicators, city benchmarking and real-time dashboards
Global urban policy and the geopolitics of urban data
The 'Urban Age' in Question
Practising Urban and Regional Research beyond Metrocentricity
The Nature of Cities
Comparative Urbanism
A World of Standards but not a Standard World
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |