Developing an evidence‐based model to implement co‐governance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19232846 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Shona Bate (0000-0003-3976-0253, International Centre for Future Health Systems UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia, corresponding author), Ciara Smyth (0000-0003-1991-5780, Social Policy Research Centre UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia), Ilan Katz (0000-0001-9002-0205, Social Policy Research Centre UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia), Bingqin Li (0000-0003-2240-0876, Social Policy Research Centre UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia), Fiona Haigh (0000-0002-5706-5118, International Centre for Future Health Systems UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-23 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Journal of Public Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0313-6647 • E-ISSN: 1467-8500 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-8500.70041 |
| OpenAlex | W7155493282 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 27 |
Governments are seeking innovative ways to address complex policy issues in increasingly fragmented and fiscally constrained service contexts. Co‐governance is a relatively new mechanism for facilitating collective decision‐making between government and other stakeholders. Effective co‐governance can be difficult to establish and resource‐ and time‐intensive to implement. This article presents findings from a study that aimed to develop a model for implementing effective co‐governance—relevant to both government and non‐government stakeholders. First, we developed a conceptual model of the co‐governance process based on a review of the literature. We then tested it in three very different co‐governance arrangements in Australia. Cross‐case analysis identified the drivers and process of co‐governance, components within each stage of the process, and factors that enabled its implementation. The model of co‐governance developed has practical application by guiding the implementation and evaluation of co‐governance and serving as a platform for future research. Points for practitioners Co‐governance—government and community sharing decision‐making—is being used to respond to complex issues but is not well understood. We develop an evidence‐based model of co‐governance using three Australian case studies. The model describes when to consider co‐governance, such as addressing complex, long‐term issues, where there are fragmented responsibilities, and where there is low trust. The model sets out the process to establish, implement, and monitor co‐governance and the factors that support this process. The model can be used by government and community organisations to consider whether co‐governance is appropriate and, if so, how to implement it. The model can also be a platform for future research
Conceptual model · Service model · E-Government and Public Services · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development · Public Policy and Administration Research
Strengthening political leadership and policy innovation through the expansion of collaborative forms of governance
Hypothesis and Theory
Discrimination Impacts Trust During Collaborative Natural Resource Governance Involving Indigenous Communities
New frontiers in local government community engagement
Boundary Spanners in Public Management and Governance
Critical Realism, Dialectics, and Qualitative Research Methods
Governance and Accountability in Reshaping Public Services
Local Place-Based Collaborative Governance
Unpacking the Collaborative Toolbox
An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance
Why Prostitution Policy (Usually) Fails and What to Do about It
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
| Highly cited | No |
|---|