Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Legal Equality Without Social Inclusion? Social Norms, Informal Institutions, and the SDG Transmission Gap in the Global South

Bibliographic Data

ID19235271
AuthorsMiao Wang (0000-0002-4102-8582, Law School, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law Wuhan China), Abdulaziz Khalid Alsharidi (0009-0007-2527-7398, Department of Mathematics and Statistics College of Science, King Faisal University Al Ahsa Saudi Arabia), Abiodun Toheeb Emiola (0009-0002-3043-8997, Purdue University West Lafeyyete Indiana USA, corresponding author)
Year2026
Publication date2026-04-28
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSustainable Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0968-0802 • E-ISSN: 1099-1719
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/sd.71125
OpenAlexW7159582900
LanguageEN
References cited30

Despite substantial progress in gender‐equal legislation across the Global South, advances in social inclusion and inclusive growth have remained uneven. This paper argues that this disconnect reflects a deeper institutional failure in the transmission of formal legal reforms into real development outcomes. We conceptualize this failure as an SDG Transmission Gap—the systematic attenuation of the development returns to legal equality caused by discriminatory informal institutions and social norms. Focusing on SDG 5 (Gender Equality) and SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), we examine whether and how informal institutions condition the effectiveness of formal legal reforms. Using a novel panel of 80 Global South countries over 2010–2023, we combine the World Bank's Women, Business and the Law index with the OECD's Social Institutions and Gender Index and estimate interaction‐based models using second‐generation panel methods that account for cross‐sectional dependence and heterogeneous institutional responses. The results show that legal equality is positively associated with women's economic participation and economic performance on average, but these gains decline sharply as discriminatory informal institutions intensify. Marginal‐effects analysis reveals that identical legal reforms yield vastly different outcomes depending on social norms. Environmental outcomes respond only indirectly, reflecting downstream effects of inclusive growth rather than direct institutional transmission. These findings demonstrate that legal reform alone is insufficient for SDG progress and underscore the need for SDG strategies that address informal institutions alongside statutory change

Developing country · Legislation · Panel data · Social equality · Statutory law · Environmental law and policy · Human Rights and Development · International Labor and Employment Law

  • Legal Empowerment and Group-Based Inequality

    Open Access•Rachel M Gisselquist•The Journal of Development Studies•2019

  • The Role of the Informal Institution

    Open Access•Yuanyuan Xu, Cheng Fu et al.•SAGE Open•2024

  • International Cooperation, Information Transmission, and Delegation

    Emiel Awad, Nicolás Riquelme•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2024

  • Legal Empowerment and Social Accountability

    Open Access•Anuradha Joshi•World Development•2017

  • Institutional jelling in socio-ecological systems

    Open Access•Jude Ndzifon Kimengsi, Gertrud Buchenrieder et al.•Land Use Policy•2025

  • What does gender equality need? Revisiting the formal and informal in feminist legal politics

    Open Access•D Cooper•Journal of Law and Society•2022

  • Gender equality in higher education and research

    Rodrigo Rosa, Sara Clavero•Journal of Gender Studies•2022

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae