Choice model analysis of the “pick any/ n ” type of binary data
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19277662 |
|---|---|
| Authors | YOSHIO TAKANE (0000-0002-4892-2018, McGill University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1998 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 31-39 |
| Publication date | 1998-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Japanese Psychological Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-5368 • E-ISSN: 1468-5884 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1468-5884.00072 |
| OpenAlex | W2062911768 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 6 |
In the “pick any/ n ” method, subjects are asked to choose any number of items from a list of n items according to some criterion. This kind of data can be analyzed as a special case of either multiple‐choice data or successive categories data where the number of response categories is limited to two. An item response model was proposed for the latter case, which is a combination of an unfolding model and a choice model. The marginal maximum‐likelihood estimation method was developed for parameter estimation to avoid incidental parameters, and an expectation‐maximization algorithm used for numerical optimization. Two examples of analysis are given to illustrate the proposed method, which we call MAXSC
Algorithm · Arithmetic · Binary data · Binary number · Estimation · Expectation–maximization algorithm · Mathematical optimization · Maximization · Maximum likelihood · Statistics · Type (biology) · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Computer Science · Mathematics · Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
Latent structure analysis
A General Structural Equation Model with Dichotomous, Ordered Categorical, and Continuous Latent Variable Indicators
Marginal Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Item Parameters
Estimation of Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded Scores
The Measurement of Scalability for Non-Cumulative Items
A marginalization model for the multidimensional unfolding analysis of ranking data
| Citations per year | 0.09 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2003 - 2006 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |