Correspondence between personality trait ratings and behavioral events
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19280069 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Gormly (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1984 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 220-232 |
| Publication date | 1984-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Personality (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3506 • E-ISSN: 1467-6494 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1984.tb00878.x |
| OpenAlex | W1979375435 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 14 |
To investigate the validity of the trait, Energetic , two studies were conducted in which trait ratings of Energetic and objective measures of performance were recorded. The first study used naive raters ( N = 55) who observed pairs of subjects perform in a laboratory setting. There was 84% agreement ( p Energetic , and people rated as more Energetic performed more energetically on the objectively measured tasks ( p Energetic and objective measures of energetic behavior in a laboratory setting. There was high agreement among the peers in ratings of Energetic , r = .95 (N = 30) and r = .93 (N = 31) for two groups. Nine men from the upper‐quartile and nine men from the lower‐quartile of the Energetic scores were tested in the laboratory and were given a structured interview regarding their physical activities. The correlation between peer ratings and laboratory performance was .56 and between peer ratings and the interview data, .64. The results support the position that trait ratings can be valid indicators of regularities in behavior. The procedures used in these studies could be a generally useful model for investigations of the validity of trait ratings
Personality · Quartile · Statistics · Trait · Behavioral and Psychological Studies · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Clinical Psychology · Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports · Psychology · Social Psychology
Congruence of Others' and Self-Judgments of Personality
Personality Measurement
A Meta‐analysis of Self‐supervisor, Self‐peer, and Peer‐supervisor Ratings
Comparison of self‐reports, reports by knowledgeable informants, and behavioral observation data
Convergence of self-reports and independent observers
Five Robust Trait Dimensions
Personality research methods
Beyond déjà vu in the search for cross-situational consistency.
The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings
The frequency concept of disposition
On the relationship between conceptual schemes and behaviour reports
Constructing cross-situational consistencies in behavior
Implicit personality theory
Traits, tests, and personality research
Traits, tests, and personality research
Accurate reflection or systematic distortion? A reply to Block, Weiss, and Thorne
Consistency of sociobehavioral responses to interpersonal disagreement
The stability of behavior
How relevant is a semantic similarity interpretation of personality ratings
Validation of personality traits
| Citations per year | 0.17 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1986 - 1997 (12) |
| Highly cited | No |