Consensus, controversy, and chaos in the attribution of characteristics to the morally exceptional
Bibliographic Data
OBJECTIVE: What do people see as distinguishing the morally exceptional from others? To handle the problem that people may disagree about who qualifies as morally exceptional, we asked subjects to select and rate their own examples of morally exceptional, morally average, and immoral people. METHOD: Subjects rated each selected exemplar on several enablers of moral action and several directions of moral action. By applying the logic underlying stimulus sampling in experimental design, we evaluated perceivers' level of agreement about the characteristics of the morally exceptional, even though perceivers rated different targets. RESULTS: Across three studies, there was strong subjective consensus on who is morally exceptional: those who are empathetic and prone to guilt, those who reflect on moral issues and identify with morality, those who have self-control and actually enact moral behaviors, and those who care about harm, compassion, fairness, and honesty. Deep controversies also existed about the moral directions pursued by those seen as morally exceptional: People evaluated those who pursued similar values and made similar decisions more favorably. CONCLUSION: Strong consensus suggests characteristics that may push a person to go beyond normal expectations, that the study of moral exceptionality is not overly hindered by disagreement over who is morally exceptional, and that there is some common ground between disagreeing camps
Action (physics) · Attribution · Blame · Compassion · Empathy · Epistemology · Harm · Honesty · Moral psychology · Moral responsibility · Morality · Ethics in Business and Education · Law · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Exemplarist Moral Theory
Morality as Cooperation
The Psychology of Moral Conviction
Moral attentiveness
Morality’s Centrality to Liking, Respecting, and Understanding Others
On the Dominance of Moral Categories in Impression Formation
High Self‐Control Predicts Good Adjustment, Less Pathology, Better Grades, and Interpersonal Success
Hierarchical Integration of Agency and Communion
Relativism or tolerance? Defining, assessing, connecting, and distinguishing two moral personality features with prominent roles in modern societies
Personality Correlates of Heroic Rescue During the Holocaust
The Duke University Religion Index (Durel)
Development and validation of the Moral Character Questionnaire
Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation
Naturalistic conceptions of moral maturity
Judging those who judge
I appreciate your effort
Social dominance orientation
Introducing the Gasp scale
Differing Conceptions of Moral Exemplarity
The self-importance of moral identity
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations
Liberals and conservatives rely on common moral foundations when making moral judgments about influential people
Measuring individual differences in empathy
Mapping the moral domain
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |