The convergence and divergence of impulsivity facets in daily life
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19280888 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sarah H Sperry (0000-0002-1111-7357, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, corresponding author), Donald R Lynam (0000-0001-8306-498X, Purdue University), Thomas R Kwapil (0000-0003-1116-5954, University of North Carolina at Greensboro) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 86 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 841-852 |
| Publication date | 2018-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Personality (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3506 • E-ISSN: 1467-6494 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/jopy.12359 |
| PMID | 29125631 |
| OpenAlex | W2767314003 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
| References cited | 42 |
OBJECTIVE: Impulsivity appears to be best conceptualized as a multidimensional construct. For example, the UPPS-P model posits that there are five underlying facets of impulsivity. The present study examined the expression of the UPPS-P facets in daily life using experience sampling methodology. A specific goal of the study was to examine positive urgency, a facet added to the original UPPS model, and its convergence and divergence from the negative urgency facet. METHOD: A large nonclinical sample of young adults (n = 294) completed the UPPS-P scale and was signaled to complete questionnaires assessing daily affect, cognitions, sense of self, and impulsive behaviors eight times a day for 7 days. RESULTS: Results indicated that the UPPS-P facets are associated with disruptions in affect, cognitions, and behavior in daily life. Furthermore, all of the UPPS-P facets were associated with impulsivity in daily life. Contrary to expectation, positive urgency was associated with negative affect rather than positive affect and had a profile indistinguishable from negative urgency. CONCLUSIONS: These results generally support a four-factor model of multidimensional impulsivity with a general overall urgency factor instead of separate positive and negative urgency facets
Affect (linguistics) · Big Five personality traits · Cognition · Construct (python library) · Convergence (economics) · Developmental psychology · Facet (psychology) · Impulsivity · Personality · Psychiatry · Structural equation modeling · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Clinical Psychology · Mental Health Research Topics · Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction · Psychology · Social Psychology
Who disengages from emotion and when? An EMA study of how urgency and distress intolerance relate to daily emotion regulation
Urgency as a predictor of change in emotion dysregulation in adolescents
“I’m so dumb and worthless right now ”
When the UPPS-P Model of Impulsivity Meets a Revised Approach
The relation between stress and impulsivity during the first year of college
Acting impulsively when “upset”
Positive and negative urgency as a single coherent construct
Emotion‐related impulsivity across transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology
Perceived willpower self-efficacy fluctuates dynamically with affect and distress intolerance
Registered Report Stage II
I want it that way
A state model of negative urgency
The network structure of impulsive personality and temporal discounting
Negative urgency as a state‐level process
Personality in Adulthood
Personality and Individual Differences
Validation of the UPPS impulsive behaviour scale
Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior
The Five Factor Model and impulsivity
Reactive and proactive aggression
A Psychobiological Model of Temperament and Character
Mood-based rash action and its components
Parsing the heterogeneity of impulsivity
Species Richness of Parasite Assemblages
A Motivational Perspective on Risky Behaviors
Negative affect mediates the relation between trait urgency and behavioral distress tolerance
A Note on the Dimensionality of Quality of Life Scales
A comparison of three structural models for personality
Emotion-based dispositions to rash action
| Unique citing works | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2.33 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |