Personality Moderating Variables
A Warning about Statistical Artifact and a Comparison of Analytic Techniques
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19281925 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Victor Bissonnette (The University of Texas at Arlington, corresponding author), William Ickes (The University of Texas at Arlington), Ira H Bernstein (The University of Texas at Arlington), Ira Bernstein, Eric S Knowles (The University of Texas at Arlington), Eric Knowles |
| Year | 1990 |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 567-587 |
| Publication date | 1990-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Personality (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3506 • E-ISSN: 1467-6494 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00243.x |
| OpenAlex | W2072269752 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 24 |
| References cited | 18 |
Personality moderating variables act to qualify the relationship between a personality trait measure and a relevant behavioral criterion. Two data analytic techniques that can be used to test for significant moderating effects are the “median split” (MS) approach and the “moderated multiple regression” (MMR) approach. The goals of the present research were ( a ) to apply the MS approach to computer‐simulated data in which the moderator and trait extremity are confounded, to determine the extent of artifact, and ( b ) to compare the performance (Type I and Type II error rates) of the two approaches when applied to confounded and nonconfounded data. It was found that when the MS approach was applied to confounded data in which no real moderating effect existed, this approach produced an alarming rate of apparent, but spurious, moderating effects. When the MMR approach was applied to the same data, the rate of spurious effects was reduced to that expected by chance. When both approaches were applied to simulated data which contained genuine moderating effects, the MMR approach consistently resulted in more correct detections of these effects than the MS approach. We conclude that researchers should always employ the MMR rather than the MS approach when testing for personality moderator variable effects
Artifact (error) · Econometrics · Moderation · Personality · Spurious relationship · Statistics · Trait · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques · Computer Science · Mathematics · Psychology · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing · Social Psychology
Characteristics of men who aggress sexually and of men who imagine aggressing
The body as a source of self-esteem
On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.
Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression
Testing Moderator and Mediator Effects in Counseling Psychology Research.
How does human-AI interaction affect employees' workplace procrastination
Instrumentalness and expressiveness
Assessing Moderator Variables
Interpersonal rigidity, hostility, and complementarity in musical bands
Metatraits
Individual Difference in Goal Motives and Goal Content
Contingent Self-worth and Self-handicapping
Drive for Thinness and Attention Toward Specific Body Parts in a Nonclinical Sample
Item Variances and Median Splits
Item Variances and Median Splits
Nonlinear Personality–Performance Relationships and the Spurious Moderating Effects of Traitedness
Does personality vary across ability levels? A study using self and other ratings
Typological Measures of Shyness
Personality and geography
Reconciling questions about dichotomizing variables in criminal justice research
On the Selective Relation of Frontal Cortical Asymmetry and Anger-Out Versus Anger-Control
Is perfectionism a killer of creative thinking? A test of the model of excellencism and perfectionism
Masculinity threat
Racial Ideology and Racial Centrality as Predictors of African American College Students' Academic Performance
The Cost of Dichotomization
On predicting some of the people some of the time
Personality traits and the eye of the beholder
Public and private self-consciousness
Moderator Variables in Prediction
The Analysis of Consistency in Personality Assessment
Metatraits
Trait Relevance and the Differential Predictability of Behavior
Self-consciousness, self-report of aggressiveness, and aggression
The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research
Persons, situations, and the control of social behavior
Self-monitoring of expressive behavior
Factoring items and factoring scales are different
| Unique citing works | 24 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 1990 - 2025 (36) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 22 |