How many and what mechanisms are needed to explain self‐regulatory functions in personality dynamics

Toward a model based on the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits

Dados Bibliográficos

ID19282245
AutoresEwa Skimina (0000-0002-2888-4691, Institute of Psychology Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw Warsaw Poland, autor correspondente), Włodzimierz Strus (0000-0002-5044-5660, Institute of Psychology Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw Warsaw Poland), Jan Cieciuch (0000-0002-2291-8301, Institute of Psychology Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw Warsaw Poland), Ewa Topolewska-Siedzik (0000-0001-8224-7469, Institute of Psychology Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw Warsaw Poland)
Ano2023
Volume91
Fascículo4
Páginas882-900
Data de publicação2023-08-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Personality (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0022-3506 • E-ISSN: 1467-6494
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/jopy.12722
PMID35451067
OpenAlexW4224222913
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas7
Referências citadas63

We propose a model of basic self‐regulatory mechanisms that integrates descriptive‐structural and dynamic‐explanatory approaches to personality. Using a structural way of thinking and based on a structural model of personality (the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits), we deduced two orthogonal (distinct) but interactive mechanisms: (a) Impulse Control responsible for controlling automatically activated impulses, urges, and affective reactions and (b) Self‐Motivation responsible for regulating intentions in goal‐oriented behaviors. Their operation depends on both situational and dispositional factors and optimal functioning of both mechanisms is needed for effective regulation of behavior. People can also be characterized by relatively stable levels of Impulse Control and Self‐Motivation as dispositions, which depend on temperamental predispositions but can develop incoherently with them due to the impact of environmental factors. Combinations of Impulse Control and Self‐Motivation as dispositions result in personality types, which differ in their adaptiveness. Importantly, Impulse Control and Self‐Motivation mechanisms reveal substantial similarities to other self‐regulatory constructs described in the literature, particularly those included in Block and Block's as well as Kuhl's theories. The contribution of our paper may serve as an example of how to apply the descriptive‐structural approach to develop a dynamic‐explanatory model of personality

Cognitive psychology · Impulse (physics) · Personality · Situational ethics · Structural equation modeling · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Computer Science · Mental Health Research Topics · Personality Traits and Psychology · Psychology · Social Psychology