Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Truth behind the Zeros

A New Approach to Principal Component Analysis of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory

Bibliographic Data

ID19290643
AuthorsKristoffer H Hellton (0000-0002-4779-486X, Norwegian Computing Center, Oslo, Norway, corresponding author), Jason L Cummings (0000-0001-8944-4158, Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA), Audun Osland Vik-Mo (0000-0002-5162-3035, Stavanger University Hospital), Jan Erik Nordrehaug (0000-0002-8720-4692, University of Bergen), Dag Aarsland (0000-0001-6314-216X, Stavanger University Hospital), Geir Selbaek (0000-0001-6511-8219, Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Toensberg, Norway), Lasse M Giil (0000-0003-3520-7530, University of Bergen)
Year2021
Volume56
Issue1
Pages70-85
Publication date2021-01-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMultivariate Behavioral Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0027-3171 • E-ISSN: 1532-7906
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00273171.2020.1736976
PMID32329370
OpenAlexW3018226047
LanguageEN
References cited48

Psychiatric syndromes in dementia are often derived from the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) using principal component analysis (PCA). The validity of this statistical approach can be questioned, since the excessive proportion of zeros and skewness of NPI items may distort the estimated relations between the items. We propose a novel version of PCA, ZIBP-PCA, where a zero-inflated bivariate Poisson (ZIBP) distribution models the pairwise covariance between the NPI items. We compared the performance of the method to classical PCA under zero-inflation using simulations, and in two dementia-cohorts (N = 830, N = 1349). Simulations showed that component loadings from PCA were biased due to zero-inflation, while the loadings of ZIBP-PCA remained unaffected. ZIBP-PCA obtained a simpler component structure of "psychosis," "mood" and "agitation" in both dementia-cohorts, compared to PCA. The principal components from ZIBP-PCA had component loadings as follows: First, the component interpreted as "psychosis" was loaded by the items delusions and hallucinations. Second, the "mood" component was loaded by depression and anxiety. Finally, the "agitation" component was loaded by irritability and aggression. In conclusion, PCA is not equipped to handle zero-inflation. Using the NPI, PCA fails to identify components with a valid interpretation, while ZIBP-PCA estimates simple and interpretable components to characterize the psychopathology of dementia

Anxiety · Cognitive psychology · Dementia · Econometrics · Irritability · Mood · Pattern recognition (psychology) · Principal component analysis · Psychiatry · Psychosis · Statistics · Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research · Internal Medicine · Mathematics · Medicine · Mental Health Research Topics · Psychology

  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    American Psychiatric Association American Psychiatric Association, Ewer Ewer•Diagnostic And Statistical Manual…•2013

  • The Neuropsychiatric Inventory

    Open Access•Jason L Cummings, Michael S Mega et al.•Neurology•1994

  • Construct Validity

    Milton E Strauss, Gregory T Smith•Annual Review of Clinical…•2009

  • Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components.

    H Hotelling•Journal of Educational Psychology•1933

  • A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis

    Open Access•John L Horn•Psychometrika•1965

  • Estimating the Dimension of a Model

    Gideon Schwarz•The Annals of Statistics•1978

  • Sample size in factor analysis.

    Robert C Maccallum, Keith F Widaman et al.•Psychological Methods•1999

  • The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis

    Open Access•Henry F Kaiser•Educational and Psychological…•1960

  • Factors Influencing Four Rules For Determining The Number Of Components To Retain

    William R Zwick, Wayne F Velicer•Multivariate Behavioral Research•1982

  • On the Equivalence of Factors and Components

    Peter M Bentler, Yutaka Kano•Multivariate Behavioral Research•1990

  • Component Analysis versus Common Factor Analysis

    Wayne F Velicer, Douglas N Jackson•Multivariate Behavioral Research•1990

  • A Comparative Investigation of Rotation Criteria Within Exploratory Factor Analysis

    Daniel A Sass, Thomas A Schmitt•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2010

  • Common Factor Analysis Versus Principal Component Analysis

    Keith F Widaman•Multivariate Behavioral Research•1993

  • Multiple factor analysis

    Paul Horst•Psychological Bulletin•1948

  • The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors

    Raymond B Cattell•Multivariate Behavioral Research•1966

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae