Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Conducting Bayesian-Classical Hybrid Power Analysis with R Package Hybridpower

Bibliographic Data

ID19290652
AuthorsJoonsuk Park (0000-0003-0227-3283, independent scholar, corresponding author), Jolynn Pek (0000-0002-9694-4967, Psychology, The Ohio State University)
Year2023
Volume58
Issue3
Pages543-559
Publication date2023-05-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMultivariate Behavioral Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0027-3171 • E-ISSN: 1532-7906
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00273171.2022.2038056
PMID35263213
OpenAlexW4220991391
LanguageEN
References cited34

There are several approaches to incorporating uncertainty in power analysis. We review these approaches and highlight the Bayesian-classical hybrid approach that has been implemented in the R package hybridpower. Calculating Bayesian-classical hybrid power circumvents the problem of local optimality in which calculated power is valid if and only if the specified inputs are perfectly correct. hybridpower can compute classical and Bayesian-classical hybrid power for popular testing procedures including the t-test, correlation, simple linear regression, one-way ANOVA (with equal or unequal variances), and the sign test. Using several examples, we demonstrate features of hybridpower and illustrate how to elicit subjective priors, how to determine sample size from the Bayesian-classical approach, and how this approach is distinct from related methods. hybridpower can conduct power analysis for the classical approach, and more importantly, the novel Bayesian-classical hybrid approach that returns more realistic calculations by taking into account local optimality that the classical approach ignores. For users unfamiliar with R, we provide a limited number of RShiny applications based on hybridpower to promote the accessibility of this novel approach to power analysis. We end with a discussion on future developments in hybridpower

Algorithm · Bayesian probability · Power (physics) · Prior probability · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Mathematics · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Statistical Methods and Inference · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials

  • Design sensitivity

    Mark W Lipsey•Design sensitivity•1990

  • Uncertain Judgements

    Open Access•Andrew O’hagan, Anthony O'Hagan et al.•Uncertain judgements•2006

  • Sample-Size Planning for More Accurate Statistical Power

    Open Access•Samantha F Anderson, Ken Kelley et al.•Psychological Science•2017

  • Improving transparency and replication in Bayesian statistics

    Sarah Depaoli, Rens Van De Schoot•Psychological Methods•2017

  • Bayes factor design analysis

    Open Access•Felix Schönbrodt, Felix D Schönbrodt et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2018

  • Measurement of health status

    Open Access•Roman Jaeschke, Joel Singer et al.•Controlled Clinical Trials•1989

  • Science and Statistics

    George E P Box•Journal of the American…•1976

  • Bayes Factors

    Robert E Kass, Adrian E Raftery•Journal of the American…•1995

  • How Many Subjects

    Helena Chmura Kraemer, Christine M Blasey et al.•How Many Subjects?•2016

  • A Bayesian Power Analysis Procedure Considering Uncertainty in Effect Size Estimates from a Meta-analysis

    Han Du, Lijuan Wang•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2016

  • Presidential Address

    Robert C Maccallum•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2003

  • Assurance in Intervention Research

    Open Access•Ding‐Geng Chen, Mark W Fraser et al.•Journal of the Society for Social…•2018

  • Analyzing data

    John W Tukey•American Psychologist•1969

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae