Kynische Argumentation im Römerbrief
Römer 1–2 und Ps.-Diogenes, Epistula 28 im Vergleich
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19293117 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Torsten Jantsch (0000-0002-7834-3105, University of the Free State, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 44-63 |
| Publication date | 2018-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Testament Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0028-6885 • E-ISSN: 1469-8145 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s002868851700025x |
| OpenAlex | W2771139008 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 17 |
Recent studies have discussed Paul's letters against the backdrop of ancient Greek philosophy, particularly of Stoicism, Platonism and Cynicism. This article will take up the latter suggestion, as it shows significant similarities between Paul's argument in Rom 1–2 and the Cynic tradition, which is a neglected aspect in scholarly discussion. A comparison of Rom 1.18–32; 2.14–29 and the Cynic epistle Ps.-Diogenes, Epistula 28 will outline decisive assumptions and argumentative patterns that both letters have in common
Argument (complex analysis) · Argumentation theory · Argumentative · Art · Cynicism · Epistemology · Literature · Platonism · Political science · Politics · Stoicism · Augustinian Studies and Theology · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Classics · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History · Law · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|