Is there Stylometric Evidence for Q
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19293268 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David L Mealand (New College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 483-507 |
| Publication date | 2011-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Testament Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0028-6885 • E-ISSN: 1469-8145 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s002868851100018x |
| OpenAlex | W2103924550 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 13 |
Stylometric tests were run to assess whether, in Matthew, Q material differs in style from that of M. Correspondence Analysis was used on larger samples. Then counts of the five most frequent words in smaller samples were tested using three further methods: GLM, Discriminant Analysis and Cluster Analysis. These tests assigned about 80% of the samples to the expected source. This result permits a cautious preference for the Two Source Theory against the theory upheld by Farrer, Goulder and Goodacre
Archaeology · Cluster (spacecraft) · Linear discriminant analysis · Pattern recognition (psychology) · Preference · Statistics · Style (visual arts) · Advanced Text Analysis Techniques · Artificial Intelligence · Authorship Attribution and Profiling · Computer Science · History · Mathematics · Natural Language Processing Techniques
| Citations per year | 0.1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2016 - 2016 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |