Who Used Whom? The Relationship of Ephesians and Colossians
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19293744 |
|---|---|
| Authors | E Best (University of St Andrews, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1997 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 72-96 |
| Publication date | 1997-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Testament Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0028-6885 • E-ISSN: 1469-8145 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0028688500022505 |
| OpenAlex | W1972045480 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 5 |
The much greater similarity of Colossians and Ephesians to each other than of either to any other Pauline letter has been recognized since the beginning of the historical critical movement, and been seen to require explanation. In this paper we shall be concerned to examine only the purely literary aspect of the problem of their relationship leaving aside their theological similarities and dissimilarities; nor shall we attempt to draw theological conclusions from our discussion of individual phrases or verses. To do this would require setting them in their context in Ephesians and vastly increase the length of the paper
Archaeology · Art · Aside · Context (archaeology) · Epistemology · Image (mathematics) · Linguistics · Literature · Similarity (geometry) · Theology · Artificial Intelligence · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Computer Science · History · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.75 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |