Baur Versus Hilgenfeld
A Forgotten Chapter in the Debate on the Synoptic Problem
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19293880 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Reginald H Fuller (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1978 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 355-370 |
| Publication date | 1978-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Testament Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0028-6885 • E-ISSN: 1469-8145 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0028688500004136 |
| OpenAlex | W2166572188 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
William R. Farmer's history of the debate on the Synoptic Problem contains the following footnote: Baur answered Hilgenfeld in his Das Markuseaangeliwn , Tübingen, 1851, and the two carried on the debate for years in the Theologische Jahrbücher . This debate is worthy of thorough analysisand evaluation. When I was invited to read a paper at this year's meeting at Tübingen with the understanding that the paper should deal if possible with some aspect of the work of the Tübingen school of the mid-nineteenth century, this seemed to be an appropriate occasion to take up Professor Farmer's challenge
Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Byzantine Studies and History · Classics · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.02 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1983 - 1983 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |