The Problem of a New Testament Theology
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19293887 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ernst Käsemann (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1973 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 235-245 |
| Publication date | 1973-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Testament Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0028-6885 • E-ISSN: 1469-8145 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0028688500008092 |
| OpenAlex | W2034621631 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 1 |
In the Protestant tradition the Bible has long been regarded as the sole norm for the Church. It was from this root that, in the seventeenth century, there sprang first of all ‘biblical theology’, from which New Testament theology later branched off at the beginning of the nineteenth century. Radical historical criticism too kept closely to this tradition, and F. C. Baur made such a theology the goal of all his efforts in the study of the New Testament. Since that time the question how the problem thus posed is to be tackled and solved has remained a living issue in Germany. On the other hand, the problem for a long time held no interest for other church traditions, although here too the position has changed within the last two decades. In 1950 Meinertz wrote the first Catholic exposition, while the theme was taken up in France by Bonsirven in 1951, and by Richardson in England in 1958. Popular developments along these lines were to follow
Art · Biblical criticism · Biblical studies · Biblical theology · Criticism · Epistemology · Exposition (narrative) · Historical criticism · Literary criticism · Literature · New Testament · Norm (philosophy) · Protestantism · Theme (computing) · Theology · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Classics · History · Philosophy · Religious studies
| Citations per year | 0.05 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1986 - 1994 (9) |
| Highly cited | No |