Job Strain–Associated Inflammatory Burden and Long-Term Risk of Coronary Events
Findings from the Monica/Kora Augsburg Case-Cohort Study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19303642 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rebecca T Emeny (0000-0002-8780-5439, Helmholtz Zentrum München), Astrid Zierer, María Elena Lacruz (0000-0003-2036-3039), Jens Baumert (0000-0003-1399-6874), Christian Herder (0000-0002-2050-093X), Gabriele Gornitzka, Wolfgang Koenig (0000-0002-2064-9603), Barbara Thorand (0000-0002-8416-6440), Karl-Heinz Ladwig (0000-0002-0221-311X), Karl‐heinz Ladwig (0000-0003-0710-1720, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 75 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 317-325 |
| Publication date | 2013-04-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychosomatic Medicine (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-3174 • E-ISSN: 1534-7796 |
| Publisher | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/psy.0b013e3182860d63 |
| PMID | 23460721 |
| OpenAlex | W1972378050 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 51 |
BACKGROUND: We examined the association between job strain and coronary heart disease (CHD) and investigated the role of markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction as possible mediators of job strain-associated CHD risk. METHODS: The sample (n = 1027) included employed participants (35-64 years old, 68% male) from the population-based MONICA/KORA (Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease/Kooperative Gesundheitsforschung in der Region Augsburg) studies. At baseline Karasek's Job Strain Index was assessed during standardized personal interviews, and nine biological markers were measured (1984-1995). Participants were followed (average, 12 years) to assess incident events (sudden cardiac death or fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction). In this case-cohort design, the final sample contained 114 cases and 913 noncases. RESULTS: Baseline distributions of cardiometabolic risk factors were significantly different between cases and noncases, with no detectable job strain-specific differences. However, cases with high job strain had higher monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, interleukin (IL)-8, and IL-18 compared with noncases with high job strain. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, IL-6, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 were increased in cases versus noncases, regardless of work stress. Job strain was associated with incident coronary events in Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, and survey (hazard ratio = 2.57, 95% confidence interval = 1.09-6.07) and after adjustment for CHD risk factors (2.35, 1.003-5.49). Adjustment for monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 or IL-8 increased this risk estimate by 14.5% or 9.4%, respectively, whereas adjustment for C-reactive protein and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 led to decreased hazard ratios (-9.9% and -5.5%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Job strain increased CHD risk in healthy workers; the associated inflammatory burden may contribute to stress-related coronary pathogenesis
Cardiology · Cohort study · Confidence interval · Environmental health · Hazard ratio · Job strain · Myocardial infarction · Population · Proportional hazards model · Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Occupational and environmental lung diseases · Workplace Health and Well-being
Work stress and risk of cardiovascular mortality
Job Strain and Cardiovascular Disease
The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ)
How Do Risk Factors Work Together? Mediators, Moderators, and Independent, Overlapping, and Proxy Risk Factors
Work stress in the etiology of coronary heart disease—a meta-analysis
Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions.
Suppressor Variables in Social Work Research
Job strain, job demands, decision latitude, and risk of coronary heart disease within the Whitehall II study
Decision latitude, job strain, and myocardial infarction
Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis
Is the effect of job strain on myocardial infarction risk due to interaction between high psychological demands and low decision latitude? Results from Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program (SHEEP)
| Citations per year | 0.17 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2014 - 2016 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |