Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Effect of Pain Resilience on Experimental Pain Experience Across Different Stimuli

Bibliographic Data

ID19306986
AuthorsBrett Ankawi (0000-0001-5420-8972, Fundación Juan March, corresponding author), P Maxwell Slepian (0000-0003-0435-4191, Fundación Juan March), Lina Himawan, Lina K Himawan (0000-0002-2641-1655, Fundación Juan March), Christopher France (0000-0002-4723-0247, Fundación Juan March), Christopher R France
Year2020
Volume82
Issue6
Pages593-599
Publication date2020-07-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychosomatic Medicine (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-3174 • E-ISSN: 1534-7796
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/psy.0000000000000823
PMID32427756
OpenAlexW3025308191
LanguageEN
References cited39

OBJECTIVE: Pain resilience, one's ability to maintain behavioral engagement and adaptively regulate cognitions and emotions despite intense or prolonged pain, has been shown to protect against negative pain-related outcomes in experimental settings. A weakness of this research, and much of experimental pain research in general, has been the lack of rationale behind the selection of noxious stimuli, which can activate different nociceptive fibers. The present study sought to determine if the relationship between pain resilience and pain ratings differed across stimuli based on the stimulated nociceptors. METHODS: Healthy undergraduate students (N = 100; mean [SD] age = 19.4 [1.2] years; 60% female) completed the Pain Resilience Scale and provided continuous pain ratings during exposure to three different tasks, each selected based on their ability to stimulate specific combinations of nociceptive fibers: pinprick (Aδ fibers), cold water immersion (Aδ and C fibers), and ischemic tourniquet (C fibers). RESULTS: Participants with high pain resilience reported lower pain ratings over time during cold water immersion than did those with low pain resilience (F(1, 39) = 8.526, p = .006); however, there was no relationship between pain resilience and pain ratings during either of the pinprick or ischemic tourniquet stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides further support for the use of multiple pain stimuli for pain assessment given their unique characteristics and concludes that outcome variables aside from pain ratings may provide additional insight into the role of resilience on pain adaptation

Anesthesia · Chronic pain · Nociception · Nociceptor · Noxious stimulus · Pain catastrophizing · Pain tolerance · Physical therapy · Quantitative sensory testing · Sensory system · Threshold of pain · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Neuroscience · Pain Management and Placebo Effect · Pain Mechanisms and Treatments · Pediatric Pain Management Techniques · Psychology

  • Pain Mechanisms: A New Theory

    Open Access•Ronald Melzack, Patrick D Wall•Science•1965

  • The Pain Catastrophizing Scale

    M Sullivan, Michael J L Sullivan et al.•Psychological Assessment•1995

  • Bayes Factors

    Robert E Kass, Adrian E Raftery•Journal of the American…•1995

  • Development of a new resilience scale

    Open Access•Kathryn M Connor, Francisco Javier Sánchez Sánchez-Cañete et al.•Depression and Anxiety•2003

  • Stress and Addiction

    Mustafa Al’Absi, Mustafa al'Absi•Psychosomatic Medicine•2018

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae