Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An Exploratory Study of Subgrouping of Patients With Functional Somatic Syndrome Based on the Psychophysiological Stress Response

Its Relationship With Moods and Subjective Variables

Bibliographic Data

ID19309233
AuthorsKenji Kanbara (0000-0003-2150-4788, Kansai Medical University, corresponding author), Mikihiko Fukunaga, Hiromi Mutsuura, Hiroharu Takeuchi, K Kitamura (0000-0001-9692-8724), Yoshihide Nakai
Year2007
Volume69
Issue2
Pages158-165
Publication date2007-02-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychosomatic Medicine (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-3174 • E-ISSN: 1534-7796
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/psy.0b013e3180312cac
PMID17289824
OpenAlexW2077276677
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited33

Objective: To study the characteristics and subjective estimations of subgroups of patients with functional somatic syndrome (FSS). A characteristic in patients with FSS was reportedly hyporeactivity in the psychophysiological stress response (PSR). Methods: The PSR was measured in 59 FSS patients and 41 healthy controls. Autonomic lability scores (ALSs) of six psychophysiological measurements on PSR were calculated. Cluster analysis using the ALSs was performed in the FSS group. A discriminant analysis was also performed to identify the criterion of the subgrouping. Factor analysis scores of the six ALSs, and moods and subjective variables were compared between the subgroups. Results: Cluster analysis divided the FSS patients into two clusters. Three groups (low-lability, high-lability, and control groups) were compared. All factor scores of autonomic lability significantly differed between the low- and high-lability groups, and between the low-lability and control groups. The mood scores were higher in the high-lability group than in the low-lability group. The duration of suffering was significantly longer in the high-lability group than in the low-lability group. The distributions of symptoms and diagnosis did not significantly differ between the subgroups. Conclusions: We have tentatively verified that there are two subgroups based on the autonomic lability among FSS patients, which were independent of the type of symptoms and diagnostic category. Autonomic lability is an important axis in the multiaxial diagnosis of FSS. FSS = functional somatic syndrome; IBS = irritable bowel syndrome; FMS = fibromyalgia syndrome; FGID = functional gastrointestinal disorder; ALS = autonomic lability score; PSR = psychophysiological stress response; ANS = autonomic nervous system; VAS = visual analogue scale; SEMG = surface-electromyography; TEMP = skin temperature; SCL = skin conductance level; NSSCR = nonspecific skin conductance response; BVPAmp = blood volume pulse amplitude; STS = subjective tension score

Biology · Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Exploratory research · Fight-or-flight response · Somatic cell · Stress (linguistics) · Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies · Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies · Clinical Psychology · Genetics · Psychology · Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

  • Comparison of the symptom networks of long‐Covid and chronic fatigue syndrome

    Open Access•Michael E Hyland, Yuri Antonacci et al.•Scandinavian Journal of Psychology•2024

  • The relationship between salivary amylase and the physical and psychological changes elicited by continuation of autogenic training in patients with functional somatic syndrome

    Open Access•Tadashi Kiba, T Abe et al.•BioPsychoSocial Medicine•2017

  • Links among emotional awareness, somatic awareness and autonomic homeostatic processing

    Open Access•Kenji Kanbara, Mikihiko Fukunaga•BioPsychoSocial Medicine•2016

  • Functional Somatic Syndromes

    Open Access•Arthur J Barsky, Jonathan F Borus•Annals of Internal Medicine•1999

  • The Electrodermal System

    Michael E Dawson, Anne M Schell et al.•Handbook of Psychophysiology•2009

  • The Prevalence of ‘Alexithymic’ Characteristics in Psychosomatic Patients

    Open Access•PETER E SIFNEOS•Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics•2010

  • Functional somatic syndromes

    Open Access•Simon Wessely, Chaichana Nimnuan et al.•The Lancet•1999

  • Autonomic Response Specificity

    John I Lacey, DOROTHY E BATEMAN et al.•Psychosomatic Medicine•1953

  • Rome Ii

    Bruce D Naliboff•Psychosomatic Medicine•2002

  • Elevated Levels of Psychophysiological Arousal and Cortisol in Patients With Somatization Syndrome

    Winfried Rief, Rose Shaw et al.•Psychosomatic Medicine•1998

  • Evidence for Physiological Response Stereotypy in Migraine Headache

    Michael J Cohen, Michael R Cohen et al.•Psychosomatic Medicine•1978

  • Autonomic Response Specificity

    M A Wenger, THEODORE L CLEMENS et al.•Psychosomatic Medicine•1961

  • Psychophysiology of chronic pain

    Herta Flor, Dennis C Turk•Psychological Bulletin•1989

Citations per year0.3
Citation span2016 - 2024 (9)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae