Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Freedom and Necessity in Human Activity

Bibliographic Data

ID19332676
AuthorsKaren Momdzhyan (0000-0001-5383-5122, Lomonosov Moscow State University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Issue9
Pages6
Publication date2025-09-10
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueVoprosy Filosofii (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0042-8744 • E-ISSN: 3034-1833
PublisherInstitute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER • RU)
DOI10.21146/0042-8744-2025-9-6-18
OpenAlexW7090419179
LanguageEN

The article provides a socio-philosophical analysis of the phenomenon of free­dom, which the author considers as a unique property of social man, existing only in the world of people. In philosophical literature it is common to consider freedom as “y-self-existence”, as “independence from some other” that can in­fluence the behavior of the bearer of freedom. The author considers such inde­pendence as a necessary, but not sufficient sign of freedom. Freedom presup­poses independence from the other, but is not reduced to it, including also the ability to consciously control the internal determinants of behavior, among which the author includes genetically determined human drives to preserve the fact and acceptable quality of life, objective needs and objective interests. A person cannot abolish these determinative factors and their coercive influence on behavior, but he is able to subject them to motivational expertise, which ranks these determinants, making a free choice of urges, needs, and interests subject to priority realization or blocking. The article considers two types of human free­dom – external freedom, which is the freedom of goal realization, and internal freedom, which is the freedom of goal setting – the ability to independently choose the priority goals of life, to determine the desirable and undesirable for a person. Two types of external freedom are considered – reasonable, based on understanding and using the necessary connections of the world, and unrea­sonable, which acts as a procedural, but not productive freedom to do, but not to do something. The author argues that internal freedom – unlike external free­dom – is the subject of species-specific human needs, representing an inalienable condition of subjectivity, which a person can lose only together with the status of a subject

Control (management) · Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry) · Independence (probability theory) · Phenomenon · Property (philosophy) · Quality (philosophy) · Realization (probability) · Sign (mathematics) · Subject (documents) · Education and Professional Development · Psychology of Development and Education · Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae