Franz Brentano
The Critic of Immanuel Kant’s Philosophy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19333228 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mikhail Belousov (0000-0002-9079-6668), Ирина Блауберг (0000-0002-2702-9386), Mikhail A Belousov, Irina I Blauberg, Vadim V Vasilyev, Victor P Vizgin, Tamara B Dlugach (0000-0002-8906-9885), Victor Molchanov (0000-0002-1560-8698), Аndrei Patkul (0000-0003-3042-6785), Feodor A Dokuchayev, Алексей Эдуардович Савин (0000-0001-7140-1176), Olga F Ivashchuk, Vitaliy A Kurennoy, Ivan S Kurilovich (0000-0001-7908-8313), Victor I Molchanov, Andrei B Patkul, Alexey E Savin, Moscow School of Management “Skolkovo”, Tatiana G Shchedrina (0009-0002-5670-7921) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | 5-40 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Voprosy Filosofii (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0042-8744 • E-ISSN: 3034-1833 |
| Publisher | Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER • RU) |
| DOI | 10.21146/0042-8744-2020-9-5-40 |
| OpenAlex | W3091781949 |
| Language | EN |
On March the 19th 2019 a round table “Franz Brentano: The critic of Immanuel Kant’s philosophy”, dedicated to the publication of book Franz Brentano. “On the future of philosophy: Selected works” (Moscow: Akademicheskij proekt, 2018) was held at the Institute of Philosophy of the RAS. The round table was hosted by the journal “Voprosy filosofii”, Department of Contemporary Western Philosophy at the Institute of Philosophy of the RAS and Center for Phenomenological Philosophy of the Faculty of Philosophy of the RSUH. The discussion was attended by phenomenologists, historians of philosophy, epistemologists. Their focus was on the following topics: the historical-philosophical concept of F. Brentano and his evaluation of I. Kant’s doctrine as the reference point of the phase extreme decline in philosophy; the problem of criticizing influential concepts; skepticism and science philosophy; judgment or belief: the problem of synthetic a priori judgments; difference between analytical and synthetic; space, time, categories as themes of critical analysis; ethics: the categorical imperative as psychological fiction. The most controversial topics were the philosophical-methodological problems of the unity of social-humanitarian and natural-science knowledge
Epistemology · Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel · Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |