Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Society as an Institutional Form of Social Reality

Bibliographic Data

ID19333306
AuthorsKaren Momdzhyan (0000-0001-5383-5122, Weatherford College, corresponding author), Karen Kh Momdzhyan
Year2023
Pages18-28
Publication date2023-03-28
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueVoprosy Filosofii (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0042-8744 • E-ISSN: 3034-1833
PublisherInstitute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER • RU)
DOI10.21146/0042-8744-2023-4-18-28
OpenAlexW4362557510
LanguageEN

The article examines the controversial issues associated with understanding the category of “society”, which is of key importance for reflective social philo­sophy and theoretical sociology. The author criticizes the extremely broad inter­pretation of society as a social reality – a substantively independent subsystem of the world around us, isolated from nature and different from it. Society is understood by the author as an institutional form of the existence of social rea­lity – a self-sufficient human collective capable of producing and reproducing all the necessary conditions for the individual and collective existence of peo­ple, including their formation as social beings. The author views society as a real social group consisting of interconnected people who carry out joint coor­dinated activities aimed at realizing common interests and goals. The point of view is criticized, which denies the ontological reality of society, considering it as an “imaginary community” of people, a product of their project conscious­ness. The author criticizes the approach according to which the interpretation of society as a real group is not applicable to a society divided into classes with multidirectional interests that cause permanent conflicts between their carriers. The author analyzes the phenomenon of self-sufficient existence, which distin­guishes society from non-self-sufficient social groups, distinguishes between actual and potential forms of self-sufficiency, examines its real content associ­ated with the production of subjective, material, informational and organiza­tional elements of social life necessary for its maintenance. The article exam­ines the polemics of representatives of “methodological individualism” and “methodological collectivism” associated with the interpretation of society as an integrative subject with its own needs, interests and goals that are absent from the people who form the society

Contemporary society · Epistemology · Individualism · Interpretation (philosophy) · Political science · Social group · Social reality · Social science · Sociology · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae