Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Dutch politicians’ use of cost–benefit analysis

Bibliographic Data

ID19338161
AuthorsNiek Mouter (0000-0002-0299-5852, Delft University of Technology, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume44
Issue5
Pages1127-1145
Publication date2017-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTransportation (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0049-4488 • E-ISSN: 1572-9435
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11116-016-9697-3
OpenAlexW2291168092
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited14

28 Dutch politicians and 10 top-level civil servants were interviewed about the way Dutch politicians use cost–benefit analysis (CBA). Various types of use were identified. Politicians use CBA: (1) When forming their opinion about the desirability of transport projects; (2) As political ammunition (opportunistic use); (3) To make themselves and their decisions look more rational (symbolic use). None of the politicians stated that they solely base their judgment on CBAs. Politicians mention seven barriers that hamper the use of CBA when forming their opinion: (1) The process of forming an opinion is trivial; (2) Politicians prefer to form their opinion based on conversations rather than on reading reports; (3) Politicians don’t trust CBA’s impartiality; (4) Politicians disagree with normative choices made in CBA. An example of such a normative choice is that CBA attaches an equally large weight to everybody’s utility changes. (5) Politicians think that CBA’s explanatory power is limited; (6) Politicians receive CBAs too late; (7) When there is plenty of money, politicians care less about a project’s social profitability. Members of Parliament identified barriers 3 and 6 as the most important barriers. They regard publishing CBAs one or two months before a debate as the most auspicious solution for rectifying these barriers. An interesting observation is that no barriers for the opportunistic and symbolic use of CBA by politicians were identified. Hence, it can be concluded that it is highly likely that when politicians receive CBAs for transport projects, they will use the CBA in an opportunistic and symbolic way, but politicians will not necessarily use CBA when forming their opinion

Impartiality · Law and economics · Normative · Opinion leadership · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Secrecy · Sociology · Dutch Social and Cultural Studies · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Law

  • The Influence of Individual Characteristics and Institutional Norms on Bureaucrats’ Use of Cost–Benefit Analysis

    Open Access•Johanna Jussila Hammes, Lena Nerhagen et al.•Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis•2020

  • How evidence-based policymaking helps and hinders policy conflict

    Lars Dorren, Eva Elizabeth Anne Wolf•Policy & Politics•2023

  • Welfare economics and wicked problems in coastal and marine governance

    Open Access•Rolf A Groeneveld•Marine Policy•2020

  • Including young people, cutting time and producing useful outcomes

    Open Access•Niek Mouter, Ruth Shortall et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • The political economy of car dependence

    Open Access•Giulio Mattioli, Cameron Roberts et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2020

  • The therapeutic function of evidence-based policy making

    Open Access•Lars Dorren•Critical Policy Studies•2026

  • Cost-benefit analysis

    Open Access•Alexandra Dehnhardt, Torsten Grothmann et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2022

  • Locating the modernist state. On whether or not modernist principles govern contemporary policy practice

    Open Access•Lars Dorren•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2023

  • An empirical assessment of Dutch citizens' preferences for spatial equality in the context of a national transport investment plan

    Open Access•Niek Mouter, Sander Van Cranenburgh et al.•Journal of Transport Geography•2017

  • Chameleonic knowledge

    Open Access•Lars Dorren, Wouter Van Dooren•Policy Sciences•2021

  • Has Cost Benefit Analysis Improved Decisions in Colombia? Evidence from the Environmental Licensing Process

    Open Access•Andrés Vargas, Juan Pablo Sarmiento et al.•Ecological Economics•2020

  • The Adequacy of Cost-Benefit Analysis in the Assessment of Public Value

    Open Access•Manuel Caldeira, Erza Raskova et al.•Administration & Society•2024

  • The ideology of efficiency

    Open Access•Daniel W Bromley•Journal of Environmental…•1990

  • Institutional Safeguards for Cost Benefit Analysis

    Open Access•Andrés Gómez‐Lobo•Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis•2012

  • The Political Relevance of Planners’ Analysis

    Open Access•Tore Sager, Inger-Anne Ravlum•Planning Theory•2005

  • Project evaluation with democratic decision-making

    Open Access•Karine Nyborg•Ecological Economics•2014

  • Some Norwegian politicians' use of cost-benefit analysis

    Open Access•Karine Nyborg•Public Choice•1998

  • Between knowledge and power

    Open Access•Erik Alb k, Erik Alb�k•Policy Sciences•1995

  • New Evidence on Instrumental, Conceptual, and Symbolic Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies

    Open Access•Noureddine Amara, Nabil Amara et al.•Science Communication•2004

Unique citing works12
Citations per year1,33
Citation span2017 - 2026 (10)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae